A survey of patients with haemophilia to understand how they track product used at home. (15th May 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sholapur, N. S.; Barty, R.; Wang, G.; Almonte, T.; Heddle, N. M.
• Is Part Of: Haemophilia. Volume 19:Number 5(2013:Sep.)
• Page Start: e289
• Page End: e295
• Publication Date: 2013-05-15
• Subjects: diaries -- EZ‐Log -- haemophilia -- record keeping -- survey; Hemophilia -- Periodicals; 616.1572005
• DOI: 10.1111/hae.12170
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1351-8216

Abstract

Summary: Record keeping among individuals who manage haemophilia at home is an essential tool of communication between patient and Haemophilia Treatment Center (HTC). Complete records help HTCs monitor patients, their use of factor and ensure treatment is optimal. HTCs provide patients with a number of methods to track infusion practices. The study objectives were to: [1] determine the current methods of record keeping; [2] identify previous methods of record keeping; [3] understand the strengths and weaknesses associated with each method; and [4] gather suggestions for improvement. Survey methods were used to address the research objectives. Of the 83 patients in the Hamilton‐Niagara region who received the survey distributed through the local HTC, 51 returned surveys were included into the analysis. Descriptive statistics were used. Results indicate individuals with haemophilia record infusion practices using: paper diaries, excel spreadsheets, hand‐held PDAs and/or the online EZ‐Log Web Client. The most popular method of record keeping was EZ‐Log (45.1%) followed by paper diaries (35.2%). Advantages to using paper methods include the visual tracking of information and retaining hardcopies. The disadvantage was the inconvenience of physically submitting the records monthly. Advantages to using the online EZ‐Log Web Client included ease of use and improved accuracy. The primary disadvantage was technical errors that were difficult to troubleshoot. Record keeping practices among individuals with haemophilia seem to vary according to personal preference and convenience. Respondents suggested that saving infusion history, incorporating barcode scanners or a copy and paste function could improve electronic methods.