Anterior approach for right hepatectomy with hanging maneuver for hepatocellular carcinoma: a multi‐institutional propensity score‐matching study. (10th March 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Anterior approach for right hepatectomy with hanging maneuver for hepatocellular carcinoma: a multi‐institutional propensity score‐matching study. (10th March 2017)
- Main Title:
- Anterior approach for right hepatectomy with hanging maneuver for hepatocellular carcinoma: a multi‐institutional propensity score‐matching study
- Authors:
- Beppu, Toru
Imai, Katsunori
Okuda, Koji
Eguchi, Susumu
Kitahara, Kenji
Taniai, Nobuhiko
Ueno, Shinichi
Shirabe, Ken
Ohta, Masayuki
Kondo, Kazuhiro
Nanashima, Atsushi
Noritomi, Tomoaki
Shiraishi, Masayuki
Takami, Yuko
Okamoto, Kohji
Kikuchi, Ken
Baba, Hideo
Fujioka, Hikaru - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: This multi‐institutional study aimed to assess the benefits of anterior approach for right hepatectomy with hanging maneuver (ARH‐HM) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with conventional right hepatectomy (CRH). Methods: From January 2000 to December 2012, 306 patients with HCC ≥5 cm were divided into two groups: ARH‐HM ( n = 104) and CRH ( n = 202). Results: After one‐to‐one propensity score‐matched analysis, 72 ARH‐HM and 72 CRH patients presented comparable background factors. Patients in the ARH‐HM group demonstrated significantly less intraoperative blood loss (480 vs. 1, 242 g, P < 0.001) and a lower frequency of red cell concentrate transfusion (21.1% vs. 50.7%, P < 0.001) compared with patients in the CRH group. The 5‐year overall survival rate was significantly better in the ARH‐HM group compared with the CRH group (50.2% vs. 31.4%, P = 0.021). Limited to patients with HCC ≥10 cm, recurrence‐free and overall survival of the ARH‐HM group was significantly greater than those of the CRH group. Conclusion: In comparison with CRH, ARH‐HM for large HCC can provide better overall survival rates with a decrease in intraoperative blood loss and transfusion rates. Survival impact was evident especially in patients with HCC ≥10 cm. Abstract : Highlight Beppu and colleagues assessed the benefits of the anterior approach with hanging maneuver compared with the conventional approach for right hepatectomy using precise propensity‐scoreAbstract: Background: This multi‐institutional study aimed to assess the benefits of anterior approach for right hepatectomy with hanging maneuver (ARH‐HM) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) compared with conventional right hepatectomy (CRH). Methods: From January 2000 to December 2012, 306 patients with HCC ≥5 cm were divided into two groups: ARH‐HM ( n = 104) and CRH ( n = 202). Results: After one‐to‐one propensity score‐matched analysis, 72 ARH‐HM and 72 CRH patients presented comparable background factors. Patients in the ARH‐HM group demonstrated significantly less intraoperative blood loss (480 vs. 1, 242 g, P < 0.001) and a lower frequency of red cell concentrate transfusion (21.1% vs. 50.7%, P < 0.001) compared with patients in the CRH group. The 5‐year overall survival rate was significantly better in the ARH‐HM group compared with the CRH group (50.2% vs. 31.4%, P = 0.021). Limited to patients with HCC ≥10 cm, recurrence‐free and overall survival of the ARH‐HM group was significantly greater than those of the CRH group. Conclusion: In comparison with CRH, ARH‐HM for large HCC can provide better overall survival rates with a decrease in intraoperative blood loss and transfusion rates. Survival impact was evident especially in patients with HCC ≥10 cm. Abstract : Highlight Beppu and colleagues assessed the benefits of the anterior approach with hanging maneuver compared with the conventional approach for right hepatectomy using precise propensity‐score matching. In large hepatocellular carcinoma, in particular, the anterior approach with hanging maneuver provided excellent overall survival rates with lower intraoperative blood loss and transfusion rates. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences. Volume 24:Number 3(2017)
- Journal:
- Journal of hepato-biliary-pancreatic sciences
- Issue:
- Volume 24:Number 3(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 24, Issue 3 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 24
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0024-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 127
- Page End:
- 136
- Publication Date:
- 2017-03-10
- Subjects:
- Anterior approach -- Hepatectomy -- Hepatocellular carcinoma -- Liver hanging maneuver -- Propensity score
Liver -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Biliary tract -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Pancreas -- Diseases -- Periodicals
617.556 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1868-6982 ↗
http://www.springerlink.com/content/121581 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1002/jhbp.431 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1868-6974
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4997.660000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 2075.xml