Consent and confidentiality in the light of recent demands for data sharing. Issue 2 (3rd February 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Williams, Garrath; Pigeot, Iris
• Is Part Of: Biometrical journal. Volume 59:Issue 2(2017:Mar.)
• Page Start: 240
• Page End: 250
• Publication Date: 2016-02-03
• Subjects: Data protection -- Ethical review -- Informed consent -- Privacy -- Research ethics -- Trustworthiness; Biometry -- Periodicals; Medical statistics -- Periodicals; 570.15195
• DOI: 10.1002/bimj.201500044
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0323-3847

Abstract

Abstract : Many attempts have been made to formalize ethical requirements for research. Among the most prominent mechanisms are informed consent requirements and data protection regimes. These mechanisms, however, sometimes appear as obstacles to research. In this opinion paper, we critically discuss conventional approaches to research ethics that emphasize consent and data protection. Several recent debates have highlighted other important ethical issues and underlined the need for greater openness in order to uphold the integrity of health‐related research. Some of these measures, such as the sharing of individual‐level data, pose problems for standard understandings of consent and privacy. Here, we argue that these interpretations tend to be overdemanding: They do not really protect research subjects and they hinder the research process. Accordingly, we suggest another way of framing these requirements. Individual consent must be situated alongside the wider distribution of knowledge created when the actions, commitments, and procedures of researchers and their institutions are opened to scrutiny. And instead of simply emphasizing privacy or data protection, we should understand confidentiality as a principle that facilitates the sharing of information while upholding important safeguards. Consent and confidentiality belong to a broader set of safeguards and procedures to uphold the integrity of the research process.