From paperwork to parenting: experiences of professional staff in student support. Issue 3 (5th December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hu, Wendy C Y; Flynn, Eleanor; Mann, Rebecca; Woodward‐Kron, Robyn
• Is Part Of: Medical education. Volume 51:Issue 3(2017)
• Page Start: 290
• Page End: 301
• Publication Date: 2016-12-05
• Subjects: Medical education -- Periodicals; Medical education -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; 610.7
• DOI: 10.1111/medu.13143
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0308-0110

Abstract

Abstract : Context: For academic staff, responding to student concerns is an important responsibility. Professional staff, or non‐academic staff who do administrative work in medical schools, are often the first to be approached by students, yet there is little research on how they manage student issues. Informed by the conceptual framework of emotional labour, we examined the experiences of professional staff, aiming to identify theoretical and practical insights for improving the provision of student support. We examined the scope of support provided, the impact of providing this support on staff and how these impacts can be managed. Methods: Professional staff at two medical schools were invited to participate in semi‐structured qualitative interviews. Interviews were transcribed and independently analysed for emergent themes. Data analysis continued with purposive sampling for maximum variation until thematic saturation was reached. Findings were returned to participants in writing and via oral presentations for member checking and refinement. Results: Twenty‐two female staff from clinical, teaching and commercial backgrounds at nine urban and rural teaching sites were interviewed. Participants described providing support for diverse concerns, from routine requests to life‐threatening emergencies. Four major themes emerged: firstly, all described roles consistent with emotional labour . Secondly, student support was regarded as informal work, and not well recognised or defined. Consequently, many drew upon their personal orientation to provide support. Finally, we identified both positive and negative personal impacts, including ongoing distress after critical events. Conclusions: Professional staff perform a range of student support work, leading to emotional, personal and work impacts. In turn, they need support, recognition and training in this essential but under‐recognised role. Emotional labour offers a conceptual framework for understanding the gendered nature and impact of this work and how it may be managed. We suggest practical strategies for promoting positive and preventing negative effects on staff from supporting medical students.