Constraints on oceanic methane emissions west of Svalbard from atmospheric in situ measurements and Lagrangian transport modeling. Issue 23 (10th December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pisso, I.; Myhre, C. Lund; Platt, S. M.; Eckhardt, S.; Hermansen, O.; Schmidbauer, N.; Mienert, J.; Vadakkepuliyambatta, S.; Bauguitte, S.; Pitt, J.; Allen, G.; Bower, K. N.; O'Shea, S.; Gallagher, M. W.; Percival, C. J.; Pyle, J.; Cain, M.; Stohl, A.
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 121:Issue 23(2016)
• Page Start: 14, 188
• Page End: 14, 200
• Publication Date: 2016-12-10
• Subjects: Arctic methane -- emission flux -- inversion -- hydrates -- Lagrangian transport; Atmospheric physics -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; 551.5
• DOI: 10.1002/2016JD025590
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-897X

Abstract

Abstract: Methane stored in seabed reservoirs such as methane hydrates can reach the atmosphere in the form of bubbles or dissolved in water. Hydrates could destabilize with rising temperature further increasing greenhouse gas emissions in a warming climate. To assess the impact of oceanic emissions from the area west of Svalbard, where methane hydrates are abundant, we used measurements collected with a research aircraft (Facility for Airborne Atmospheric Measurements) and a ship (Helmer Hansen) during the Summer 2014 and for Zeppelin Observatory for the full year. We present a model‐supported analysis of the atmospheric CH4 mixing ratios measured by the different platforms. To address uncertainty about where CH4 emissions actually occur, we explored three scenarios: areas with known seeps, a hydrate stability model, and an ocean depth criterion. We then used a budget analysis and a Lagrangian particle dispersion model to compare measurements taken upwind and downwind of the potential CH4 emission areas. We found small differences between the CH4 mixing ratios measured upwind and downwind of the potential emission areas during the campaign. By taking into account measurement and sampling uncertainties and by determining the sensitivity of the measured mixing ratios to potential oceanic emissions, we provide upper limits for the CH4 fluxes. The CH4 flux during the campaign was small, with an upper limit of 2.5 nmol m −2 s −1 in the stability model scenario. The Zeppelin Observatory data for 2014 suggest CH4 fluxes from the Svalbard continental platform below 0.2 Tg yr −1 . All estimates are in the lower range of values previously reported. Key Points: Measurements around Svalbard show no atmospheric methane (CH4 ) enhancements from CH4 releases into seawater from the ocean floor We provide an upper limit for oceanic CH4 emissions compatible with the lack of an observable atmospheric signal Sea‐air emission fluxes of CH4 are small offshore Svalbard, both for transfer via bubbles and via diffusive flux of dissolved CH4