Segregation, exclusion and LGBT people in disaster impacted areas: experiences from the Higashinihon Dai-Shinsai (Great East-Japan Disaster). Issue 1 (2nd January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Yamashita, Azusa; Gomez, Christopher; Dombroski, Kelly
• Is Part Of: Gender, place and culture. Volume 24:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: 64
• Page End: 71
• Publication Date: 2017-01-02
• Subjects: Vulnerability -- inequalities -- disaster management -- LGBT -- Great East Japan Disaster -- social exclusion; Vulnerabilidad -- desigualdades -- gestión del desastre -- LGBT -- Gran Desastre del Este del Japón -- exclusión social; 脆弱性 -- 不均 -- 灾难管理 -- LGBT -- 东日本大灾难 -- 社会排除; Human geography -- Periodicals; Feminism -- Periodicals; Géographie féministe -- Périodiques; 305.305
• DOI: 10.1080/0966369X.2016.1276887
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0966-369X

Abstract

Abstract: The Great East-Japan Disaster, which began with the earthquake and tsunami of March 2011, prompted discussions throughout the Japanese lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community on the vulnerabilities that LGBT people face during disaster because of sexual orientation, gender identity and gender expression. This short essay shares some of the post-disaster experiences, challenges and discussions of the LGBT community in Japan. Reports coming out of the LGBT community have stressed that pre-disaster discrimination and fears of discrimination and repression among LGBT people have hampered their recovery. There is a real fear of being discriminated against and having their family and friends discriminated against. This situation has led to the isolation and vulnerability of LGBT individuals. Despite the majority being reluctant to come out publically, the disaster forced numerous individuals to reveal their gender identity, particularly when confronted with life in shelters, the lack of supply of medication and so on. In turn, this has resulted in instances of discrimination and bullying. These accounts reveal that the main aims of disaster policies and disaster ethics – based on addressing the greatest good of the majority – largely fail to cater for LGBT people, who are not only victims of the disaster but can also be valuable contributors in the Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) process.