An accuracy study of computer-planned implant placement in the augmented maxilla using osteosynthesis screws. Issue 4 (April 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Verhamme, L.M.; Meijer, G.J.; Soehardi, A.; Bergé, S.J.; Xi, T.; Maal, T.J.J.
• Is Part Of: International journal of oral & maxillofacial surgery. Volume 46:Issue 4(2017:Apr.)
• Page Start: 511
• Page End: 517
• Publication Date: 2017-04
• Subjects: implant planning -- CAD/CAM technology -- surgical guides -- sinus floor elevation -- flapless implant surgery -- edentulous maxilla -- cone beam computed tomography -- computer-assisted -- atrophic maxilla -- accuracy -- osteosynthesis screws; Mouth -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Maxilla -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Dentistry -- Periodicals; Dentistry, Operative; Oral Surgical Procedures; Surgery, Oral; Dentistry; Maxilla -- Surgery; Mouth -- Surgery; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 617.52059
• DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.10.013
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0901-5027

Abstract

Abstract: Previous research on the accuracy of flapless implant placement of virtually planned implants in the augmented maxilla revealed unfavourable discrepancies between implant planning and placement. By using the osteosynthesis screws placed during the augmentation procedure, the surgical template could be optimally stabilized. The purpose of this study was to validate this method by evaluating its clinically relevant accuracy. Twelve consecutive fully edentulous patients with extreme resorption of the maxilla were treated with a bone augmentation procedure. Virtual implant planning was performed and a surgical template was manufactured. Subsequently, six implants were installed using the surgical template, which was only supported by the osteosynthesis screws. Implant deviations between planning and placement were calculated. A total of 72 implants were installed. Mean deviations found in the mesiodistal direction were 0.817 mm at the implant tip and 0.528 mm at the implant shoulder. The angular deviation was 2.924°. In the buccolingual direction, a deviation of 1.038 mm was registered at the implant tip and 0.633 mm at the implant shoulder. The angular deviation was 3.440°. This study showed that implant placement in the augmented maxilla using a surgical template supported by osteosynthesis screws is accurate.