Comparison of Perioperative Complications by Route of Hysterectomy Performed for Benign Conditions. Issue 5 (September 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of Perioperative Complications by Route of Hysterectomy Performed for Benign Conditions. Issue 5 (September 2016)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of Perioperative Complications by Route of Hysterectomy Performed for Benign Conditions
- Authors:
- Rahimi, Salma
Jeppson, Peter C.
Gattoc, Leda
Westermann, Lauren
Cichowski, Sara
Raker, Chris
Weber LeBrun, Emily
Sung, Vivian - Abstract:
- Abstract : Objective: The aim of this study was to compare perioperative complications by route of hysterectomy before and after the introduction of robotic surgery. Methods: This is an ancillary analysis of a multicenter, retrospective cohort study with historical controls through the Fellows' Pelvic Research Network. Hysterectomies performed for benign conditions were collected prior to introduction of the robot (prerobot) and the year after introduction of the robot (postrobot) at each institution. To obtain a representative annual case distribution for each institution, a maximum of 20 cases per month were selected using stratified random sampling. Patient demographics and intraoperative and postoperative complication data were collected. Results: One thousand four hundred forty cases were included in this study, 732 in the prerobot and 708 in the postrobot period. Intraoperative complications in the prerobot group were highest in the abdominal group (7.4%) followed by vaginal (3.9%) and laparoscopic (3.7%) groups. Postoperative complications were higher in the vaginal (8.3%) and abdominal (7.4%) groups compared with laparoscopic (1.8%) groups ( P = 0.03), because of a higher proportion of infections. In the postrobot period, intraoperative complications were lower in the vaginal (2.8%), robotic (3%), and laparoscopic (4.6%) groups compared with abdominal (10.8%) ( P = 0.04). Postoperative complications were lowest in the vaginal (5.1%), laparoscopic (3.6%), and roboticAbstract : Objective: The aim of this study was to compare perioperative complications by route of hysterectomy before and after the introduction of robotic surgery. Methods: This is an ancillary analysis of a multicenter, retrospective cohort study with historical controls through the Fellows' Pelvic Research Network. Hysterectomies performed for benign conditions were collected prior to introduction of the robot (prerobot) and the year after introduction of the robot (postrobot) at each institution. To obtain a representative annual case distribution for each institution, a maximum of 20 cases per month were selected using stratified random sampling. Patient demographics and intraoperative and postoperative complication data were collected. Results: One thousand four hundred forty cases were included in this study, 732 in the prerobot and 708 in the postrobot period. Intraoperative complications in the prerobot group were highest in the abdominal group (7.4%) followed by vaginal (3.9%) and laparoscopic (3.7%) groups. Postoperative complications were higher in the vaginal (8.3%) and abdominal (7.4%) groups compared with laparoscopic (1.8%) groups ( P = 0.03), because of a higher proportion of infections. In the postrobot period, intraoperative complications were lower in the vaginal (2.8%), robotic (3%), and laparoscopic (4.6%) groups compared with abdominal (10.8%) ( P = 0.04). Postoperative complications were lowest in the vaginal (5.1%), laparoscopic (3.6%), and robotic (3%) approaches compared with the abdominal (13.9%) approach ( P = 0.003). Conclusions: Vaginal hysterectomy has comparable rates of perioperative complications when compared with robotic and laparoscopic approaches and should be considered as a primary surgical approach in the growing armamentarium of minimally invasive approaches for hysterectomy for benign conditions. Abstract : Vaginal hysterectomy has comparable rates of perioperative complications when compared to robotic and laparoscopic approaches and should be considered as a primary surgical approach in the growing armamentarium of minimally invasive approaches for hysterectomy for benign conditions. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery. Volume 22:Issue 5(2016:Sep./Oct.)
- Journal:
- Female pelvic medicine & reconstructive surgery
- Issue:
- Volume 22:Issue 5(2016:Sep./Oct.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 22, Issue 5 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 22
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0022-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2016-09
- Subjects:
- hysterectomy complications -- laparoscopic hysterectomy -- robotic hysterectomy -- vaginal hysterectomy
Pelvis -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Pelvis -- Surgery -- Periodicals
Genital Diseases, Female -- surgery -- Periodicals
Urologic Diseases -- surgery -- Periodicals
Colonic Diseases -- surgery -- Periodicals
Rectal Diseases -- surgery -- Periodicals
Surgical Procedures, Operative -- methods -- Periodicals
616.6 - Journal URLs:
- http://gateway.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&MODE=ovid&PAGE=toc&D=ovft&AN=01436319-000000000-00000 ↗
http://journals.lww.com/jpelvicsurgery/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://www.jpelvicsurgery.com ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/SPV.0000000000000292 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 2151-8378
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3905.168400
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 318.xml