Validation of a Nutritional Screening Tool for Ambulatory Use in Pediatrics. Issue 5 (May 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rub, Gal; Marderfeld, Luba; Poraz, Irit; Hartman, Corina; Amsel, Shlomo; Rosenbaum, Israel; Pergamentzev-Karpol, Shiri; Monsonego-Ornan, Efrat; Shamir, Raanan
• Is Part Of: Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. Volume 62:Issue 5(2016)
• Page Start: 771
• Page End: 775
• Publication Date: 2016-05
• Subjects: anthropometry -- community -- Malnutrition -- nutritional assessment -- nutritional screening -- pediatrics; Children -- Nutrition -- Periodicals; Pediatric gastroenterology -- Periodicals; Infants -- Nutrition -- Periodicals; Nutrition disorders in children -- Periodicals; Child Nutrition -- Periodicals; Digestive System -- growth & development -- Periodicals; Gastrointestinal Diseases -- Periodicals; Infant Nutrition -- Periodicals; Nutrition Disorders -- Periodicals; Child; 618.923
• DOI: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001046
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0277-2116

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Objectives: To evaluate the use of Screening Tool for the Assessment of Malnutrition in Pediatrics (STAMP) in a primary health care clinic in the community and to assess the impact of its use on medical staff's awareness of nutritional status. Methods: STAMP scoring system was tested as is and with modifications in the ambulatory setting. Nutritional risk according to STAMP was compared with a detailed nutritional assessment performed by a registered dietitian. Recording of nutrition-related data and anthropometric measurements in medical files were compared prior and post implementation. Results: Sixty children were included (31 girls, 52%), ages between 1 and 6 years, mean age 2.8 ± 1.5 (mean ± SD). STAMP scores yielded a fair agreement between STAMP and the dietitian's nutritional assessment: κ = 0.47 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24–0.7), sensitivity of 47.62% (95% CI 28.34–67.63). Modified STAMP yielded more substantial agreement: κ = 0.57 (95% CI 0.35–0.79), sensitivity of 76.19% (95% CI 54.91–89.37), specificity of 82.05% (95% CI 67.33–91.02). The use of STAMP resulted in an increase in recording of appetite, dietary intake, and anthropometric measurements. Conclusions: Modification of the STAMP improved nutritional risk evaluation in community setting. The use of STAMP in a primary health care clinic raised clinician's awareness to nutritional status. Further work will identify whether this could be translated into lower malnutrition rates and better child care.