Computed Tomography Observer Agreement in Staging Malignant Lymphoma. Issue 2 (March 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: de Jong, Antoinette; Kwee, Thomas C.; Quarles van Ufford, Henriëtte M.E.; Beek, Frederik J.A.; Quekel, Lorentz G.B.A.; de Klerk, John M.H.; Zijlstra, Josée M.; Fijnheer, Rob; Ludwig, Inge; Kersten, Marie José; Stoker, Jaap; Nievelstein, Rutger A.J.
• Is Part Of: Journal of computer assisted tomography. Volume 40:Issue 2(2016)
• Publication Date: 2016-03
• Subjects: tomography -- x-ray computed -- lymphoma -- tumor staging -- observer variation -- positron-emission tomography; Tomography -- Periodicals; Tomography -- Periodicals; Tomography; Periodicals; 616.0757
• DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000000338
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0363-8715

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To determine pretreatment computed tomography observer agreement in patients with newly diagnosed lymphoma. Methods: Forty-nine computed tomography scans were reviewed by 3 experienced radiologists, with each scan assessed twice by 1 observer. Predefined nodal and extranodal regions were assessed, and Ann Arbor stages were assigned. K-statistics were defined as poor (κ < 0.2), fair (κ > 0.2 to κ ⩽ 0.4), moderate (κ > 0.4 to κ ⩽ 0.6), substantial (κ > 0.6 to κ ⩽ 0.8), and almost perfect (κ > 0.8 to κ ⩽ 1). Results: Nodal interobserver agreement varied from 0.09 for infraclavicular involvement to 0.95 for para-iliac involvement; intraobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect, except for infraclavicular nodes. Extranodal interobserver agreement varied from 0.56 to 0.88; intraobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect. Ann Arbor stage interobserver agreement varied from 0.57 to 0.69; intraobserver agreement was substantial. Conclusion: Computed tomography observer agreement in staging malignant lymphoma appears to be suboptimal.