Physicians' Awareness, Attitudes, and Experiences Regarding Imiquimod Treatment of Vaginal and Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Issue 1 (January 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Koeneman, Margot M.; van de Sande, Anna J. M.; van Beekhuizen, Heleen J.; Gerestein, Kees G.; van de Laar, Rafli; Kruitwagen, Roy F. P. M.; Kruse, Arnold-Jan
• Is Part Of: Journal of lower genital tract disease. Volume 20:Issue 1(2016:Jan.)
• Publication Date: 2016-01
• Subjects: attitude -- cervical intraepithelial neoplasia -- imiquimod -- professional practice -- vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia; Generative organs, Female -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Cervix uteri -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Generative organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Sexually transmitted diseases -- Periodicals; 618.1
• DOI: 10.1097/LGT.0000000000000158
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1089-2591

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: The aim of the study was to assess awareness, attitudes, and current clinical experiences of gynecologists regarding imiquimod as a potential treatment modality for vaginal intraepithelial neoplasia (VAIN) and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Materials and Methods: A 37-item questionnaire consisting of both multiple choice and open questions was sent to all Dutch gynecologists who regularly perform colposcopies in all 87 Dutch hospitals, in December 2014. The outcomes were assessed using descriptive statistics. Results: Gynecologists from 52 hospitals (60%) completed the questionnaire. Of the 77 respondents, 79% and 58% were aware of imiquimod for treating VAIN and CIN, respectively. Twelve and 5 respondents had used imiquimod to treat VAIN and CIN, respectively; most treatments were for intractable VAIN lesions and recurrent lesions and to avoid surgical treatment for CIN in patients with a future pregnancy wish. Most respondents reported successful treatment outcomes but frequent adverse effects. Most (96%) stated that they would consider using imiquimod to treat high-grade CIN in selected patients, but only upon additional evidence and inclusion into treatment guidelines. Conclusions: The awareness of imiquimod as a potential treatment for VAIN and CIN was limited, possibly because of the paucity of evidence regarding vaginal imiquimod efficacy, the lack of inclusion into guidelines, and the high frequency of adverse effects. Imiquimod was applied off-label in a limited number of selected patients, with good treatment results. The respondents generally had a positive attitude toward treating VAIN and CIN with imiquimod. Additional evidence on treatment efficacy and inclusion in treatment guidelines is necessary before application in clinical practice. Abstract : Additional evidence regarding efficacy, clinical applicability and long-term outcomes of imiquimod in treatment of VAIN and CIN is needed before application in clinical practice. Supplemental digital content is available in the text.