Self-Selected and Maximal Walking Speeds Provide Greater Insight Into Fall Status Than Walking Speed Reserve Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults. (July 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Self-Selected and Maximal Walking Speeds Provide Greater Insight Into Fall Status Than Walking Speed Reserve Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults. (July 2016)
- Main Title:
- Self-Selected and Maximal Walking Speeds Provide Greater Insight Into Fall Status Than Walking Speed Reserve Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults
- Authors:
- Middleton, Addie
Fulk, George D.
Herter, Troy M.
Beets, Michael W.
Donley, Jonathan
Fritz, Stacy L. - Abstract:
- ABSTRACT: Objective: To determine the degree to which self-selected walking speed (SSWS), maximal walking speed (MWS), and walking speed reserve (WSR) are associated with fall status among community-dwelling older adults. Design: WS and 1-year falls history data were collected on 217 community-dwelling older adults (median age = 82, range 65–93 years) at a local outpatient PT clinic and local retirement communities and senior centers. WSR was calculated as a difference (WSRdiff = MWS − SSWS) and ratio (WSRratio = MWS/SSWS). Results: SSWS ( P < 0.001), MWS ( P < 0.001), and WSRdiff ( P < 0.01) were associated with fall status. The cutpoints identified were 0.76 m/s for SSWS (65.4% sensitivity, 70.9% specificity), 1.13 m/s for MWS (76.6% sensitivity, 60.0% specificity), and 0.24 m/s for WSRdiff (56.1% sensitivity, 70.9% specificity). SSWS and MWS better discriminated between fallers and non-fallers (SSWS: AUC = 0.69, MWS: AUC = 0.71) than WSRdiff (AUC = 0.64). Conclusions: SSWS and MWS seem to be equally informative measures for assessing fall status in community-dwelling older adults. Older adults with SSWSs less than 0.76 m/s and those with MWSs less than 1.13 m/s may benefit from further fall risk assessment. Combining SSWS and MWS to calculate an individual's WSR does not provide additional insight into fall status in this population. To Claim CME Credits: Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online athttp://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME CME Objectives: UponABSTRACT: Objective: To determine the degree to which self-selected walking speed (SSWS), maximal walking speed (MWS), and walking speed reserve (WSR) are associated with fall status among community-dwelling older adults. Design: WS and 1-year falls history data were collected on 217 community-dwelling older adults (median age = 82, range 65–93 years) at a local outpatient PT clinic and local retirement communities and senior centers. WSR was calculated as a difference (WSRdiff = MWS − SSWS) and ratio (WSRratio = MWS/SSWS). Results: SSWS ( P < 0.001), MWS ( P < 0.001), and WSRdiff ( P < 0.01) were associated with fall status. The cutpoints identified were 0.76 m/s for SSWS (65.4% sensitivity, 70.9% specificity), 1.13 m/s for MWS (76.6% sensitivity, 60.0% specificity), and 0.24 m/s for WSRdiff (56.1% sensitivity, 70.9% specificity). SSWS and MWS better discriminated between fallers and non-fallers (SSWS: AUC = 0.69, MWS: AUC = 0.71) than WSRdiff (AUC = 0.64). Conclusions: SSWS and MWS seem to be equally informative measures for assessing fall status in community-dwelling older adults. Older adults with SSWSs less than 0.76 m/s and those with MWSs less than 1.13 m/s may benefit from further fall risk assessment. Combining SSWS and MWS to calculate an individual's WSR does not provide additional insight into fall status in this population. To Claim CME Credits: Complete the self-assessment activity and evaluation online athttp://www.physiatry.org/JournalCME CME Objectives: Upon completion of this article, the reader should be able to: (1) Describe the different methods for calculating walking speed reserve and discuss the potential of the metric as an outcome measure; (2) Explain the degree to which self-selected walking speed, maximal walking speed, and walking speed reserve are associated with fall status among community-dwelling older adults; and (3) Discuss potential limitations to using walking speed reserve to identify fall status in populations without mobility restrictions. Level: Advanced Accreditation: The Association of Academic Physiatrists is accredited by the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education to provide continuing medical education for physicians. The Association of Academic Physiatrists designates this activity for a maximum of 1.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s) ™ . Physicians should only claim credit commensurate with the extent of their participation in the activity. Abstract : Supplemental digital content is available in the text. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation. Volume 95:Number 7(2016)
- Journal:
- American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation
- Issue:
- Volume 95:Number 7(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 95, Issue 7 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 95
- Issue:
- 7
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0095-0007-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2016-07
- Subjects:
- Gait -- Aged -- Geriatric Assessment
Rehabilitation -- Periodicals
Medicine, Physical -- Periodicals
617.062 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/ajpmr/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000488 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0894-9115
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 0832.160000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 1843.xml