A Comparison of Diarrheal Severity Scores in the MAL-ED Multisite Community-Based Cohort Study. Issue 5 (November 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- A Comparison of Diarrheal Severity Scores in the MAL-ED Multisite Community-Based Cohort Study. Issue 5 (November 2016)
- Main Title:
- A Comparison of Diarrheal Severity Scores in the MAL-ED Multisite Community-Based Cohort Study
- Authors:
- Lee, Gwenyth O.
Richard, Stephanie A.
Kang, Gagandeep
Houpt, Eric R.
Seidman, Jessica C.
Pendergast, Laura L.
Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.
Ahmed, Tahmeed
Mduma, Estomih R.
Lima, Aldo A.
Bessong, Pascal
Jennifer, Mats Steffi
Hossain, Md. Iqbal
Chandyo, Ram Krishna
Nyathi, Emanuel
Lima, Ila F.
Pascal, John
Soofi, Sajid
Ladaporn, Bodhidatta
Guerrant, Richard L.
Caulfield, Laura E.
Black, Robert E.
Kosek, Margaret N. - Abstract:
- ABSTRACT: Objectives: There is a lack of consensus on how to measure diarrheal severity. Within the context of a multisite, prospective cohort study, we evaluated the performance of a modified Vesikari score (MAL-ED), 2 previously published scores (Clark and CODA [a diarrheal severity score (Community DiarrheA) published by Lee et al]), and a modified definition of moderate-to-severe diarrhea (MSD) based on dysentery and health care worker diagnosed dehydration. Methods: Scores were built using maternally reported symptoms or fieldworker-reported clinical signs obtained during the first 7 days of a diarrheal episode. The association between these and the risk of hospitalization were tested using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Severity scores were also related to illness etiology, and the likelihood of the episode subsequently becoming prolonged or persistent. Results: Of 10, 159 episodes from 1681 children, 143 (4.0%) resulted in hospitalization. The area under the curve of each score as a predictor of hospitalization was 0.84 (95% confidence interval: 0.81, 0.87) (Clark), 0.85 (0.82, 0.88) (MAL-ED), and 0.87 (0.84, 0.89) (CODA). Severity was also associated with etiology and episode duration. Although families were more likely to seek care for severe diarrhea, approximately half of severe cases never reached the health system. Conclusions: Community-based diarrheal severity scores are predictive of relevant child health outcomes. Because they require noABSTRACT: Objectives: There is a lack of consensus on how to measure diarrheal severity. Within the context of a multisite, prospective cohort study, we evaluated the performance of a modified Vesikari score (MAL-ED), 2 previously published scores (Clark and CODA [a diarrheal severity score (Community DiarrheA) published by Lee et al]), and a modified definition of moderate-to-severe diarrhea (MSD) based on dysentery and health care worker diagnosed dehydration. Methods: Scores were built using maternally reported symptoms or fieldworker-reported clinical signs obtained during the first 7 days of a diarrheal episode. The association between these and the risk of hospitalization were tested using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Severity scores were also related to illness etiology, and the likelihood of the episode subsequently becoming prolonged or persistent. Results: Of 10, 159 episodes from 1681 children, 143 (4.0%) resulted in hospitalization. The area under the curve of each score as a predictor of hospitalization was 0.84 (95% confidence interval: 0.81, 0.87) (Clark), 0.85 (0.82, 0.88) (MAL-ED), and 0.87 (0.84, 0.89) (CODA). Severity was also associated with etiology and episode duration. Although families were more likely to seek care for severe diarrhea, approximately half of severe cases never reached the health system. Conclusions: Community-based diarrheal severity scores are predictive of relevant child health outcomes. Because they require no assumptions about health care access or utilization, they are useful in refining estimates of the burden of diarrheal disease, in estimating the effect of disease control interventions, and in triaging children for referral in low- and middle-income countries in which the rates of morbidity and mortality after diarrhea remain high. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition. Volume 63:Issue 5(2016)
- Journal:
- Journal of pediatric gastroenterology and nutrition
- Issue:
- Volume 63:Issue 5(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 63, Issue 5 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 63
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0063-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2016-11
- Subjects:
- diarrhea -- epidemiology -- pediatric
Children -- Nutrition -- Periodicals
Pediatric gastroenterology -- Periodicals
Infants -- Nutrition -- Periodicals
Nutrition disorders in children -- Periodicals
Child Nutrition -- Periodicals
Digestive System -- growth & development -- Periodicals
Gastrointestinal Diseases -- Periodicals
Infant Nutrition -- Periodicals
Nutrition Disorders -- Periodicals
Child
618.923 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.jpgn.org ↗
http://ovidsp.ovid.com/ovidweb.cgi?T=JS&NEWS=n&CSC=Y&PAGE=toc&D=yrovft&AN=00005176-000000000-00000 ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001286 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0277-2116
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5030.175000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 757.xml