The Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil on Hemodynamic Stability and Analgesic Requirement After Craniotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Issue 4 (October 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil on Hemodynamic Stability and Analgesic Requirement After Craniotomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Issue 4 (October 2016)
- Main Title:
- The Effects of Dexmedetomidine and Remifentanil on Hemodynamic Stability and Analgesic Requirement After Craniotomy
- Authors:
- Rajan, Shobana
Hutcherson, Matthew T.
Sessler, Daniel I.
Kurz, Andrea
Yang, Dongsheng
Ghobrial, Michael
Liu, Jinbo
Avitsian, Rafi - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background: Anesthesia for craniotomies should blunt responses to noxious stimuli, whereas subsequently leaving patients sufficiently alert for early neurological evaluation. The aim was to compare postoperative blood pressure control, pain, and opioid requirement after anesthesia with dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil. We therefore tested 2 primary hypotheses: (1) intraoperative administration of dexmedetomidine provides better control of postoperative blood pressure than remifentanil; and (2) patients given dexmedetomidine have less postoperative pain and use less opioid. Materials and Methods: Adults having elective brain tumor excisions under balanced general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation were randomized to an infusion of remifentanil (0.08 to 0.15 μg/kg/min, n=71) or dexmedetomidine (0.2 to 0.7 μg/kg/h, n=68). Patients also received propofol, rocuronium, fentanyl, and sevoflurane. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and pain were recorded at 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 postoperative minutes. Outcomes were assessed with joint hypothesis testing, evaluating noninferiority and superiority. Results: Compared with remifentanil, the use of dexmedetomidine was associated with reduced postoperative MAP (88±12 vs. 98±11 mm Hg), with estimated mean difference (97.5% confidence interval) of −10 (−13, −4) mm Hg, P <0.001, and mean visual analog pain score (2.9±2.6 vs. 5.1±2.4 points), with estimated mean difference of −5 (−10, −3) points, P <0.001, and required lessAbstract : Background: Anesthesia for craniotomies should blunt responses to noxious stimuli, whereas subsequently leaving patients sufficiently alert for early neurological evaluation. The aim was to compare postoperative blood pressure control, pain, and opioid requirement after anesthesia with dexmedetomidine versus remifentanil. We therefore tested 2 primary hypotheses: (1) intraoperative administration of dexmedetomidine provides better control of postoperative blood pressure than remifentanil; and (2) patients given dexmedetomidine have less postoperative pain and use less opioid. Materials and Methods: Adults having elective brain tumor excisions under balanced general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation were randomized to an infusion of remifentanil (0.08 to 0.15 μg/kg/min, n=71) or dexmedetomidine (0.2 to 0.7 μg/kg/h, n=68). Patients also received propofol, rocuronium, fentanyl, and sevoflurane. The mean arterial pressure (MAP) and pain were recorded at 15, 30, 45, 60, and 90 postoperative minutes. Outcomes were assessed with joint hypothesis testing, evaluating noninferiority and superiority. Results: Compared with remifentanil, the use of dexmedetomidine was associated with reduced postoperative MAP (88±12 vs. 98±11 mm Hg), with estimated mean difference (97.5% confidence interval) of −10 (−13, −4) mm Hg, P <0.001, and mean visual analog pain score (2.9±2.6 vs. 5.1±2.4 points), with estimated mean difference of −5 (−10, −3) points, P <0.001, and required less median opioid consumption (5 [0, 10] vs. 10 [7, 15] mg morphine equivalents), with estimated median difference of −5 (−10, −3) mg, P <0.001. Dexmedetomidine was both noninferior and superior to remifentanil in maintaining postoperative hemodynamics and providing improved pain control. Conclusions: Intraoperative dexmedetomidine better controlled postoperative MAP and provided superior analgesia in patients undergoing craniotomy. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology. Volume 28:Issue 4(2016:Oct.)
- Journal:
- Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology
- Issue:
- Volume 28:Issue 4(2016:Oct.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 28, Issue 4 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 28
- Issue:
- 4
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0028-0004-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2016-10
- Subjects:
- anesthesia -- remifentanil -- dexmedetomidine -- craniotomy -- hemodynamics -- postoperative pain -- cognitive recovery
Anesthesia in neurology -- Periodicals
Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.96748 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/jnsa/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/ANA.0000000000000221 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0898-4921
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5022.150000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 814.xml