Nerve Stimulation Enhances Task-Oriented Training in Chronic, Severe Motor Deficit After Stroke: A Randomized Trial. Issue 7 (July 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Nerve Stimulation Enhances Task-Oriented Training in Chronic, Severe Motor Deficit After Stroke: A Randomized Trial. Issue 7 (July 2016)
- Main Title:
- Nerve Stimulation Enhances Task-Oriented Training in Chronic, Severe Motor Deficit After Stroke
- Authors:
- Carrico, Cheryl
Chelette, Kenneth C.
Westgate, Philip M.
Powell, Elizabeth
Nichols, Laurie
Fleischer, Anne
Sawaki, Lumy - Abstract:
- Abstract : Background and Purpose—: A sensory-based intervention called peripheral nerve stimulation can enhance outcomes of motor training for stroke survivors with mild-to-moderate hemiparesis. Further research is needed to establish whether this paired intervention can have benefit in cases of severe impairment (almost no active movement). Methods—: Subjects with chronic, severe poststroke hemiparesis (n=36) were randomized to receive 10 daily sessions of either active or sham stimulation (2 hours) immediately preceding intensive task-oriented training (4 hours). Upper extremity movement function was assessed using Fugl–Meyer Assessment (primary outcome measure), Wolf Motor Function Test, and Action Research Arm Test at baseline, immediately post intervention and at 1-month follow-up. Results—: Statistically significant difference between groups favored the active stimulation group on Fugl–Meyer at postintervention (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–6.9; P =0.008) and 1-month follow-up (95% CI, 0.6–8.3; P =0.025), Wolf Motor Function Test at postintervention (95% CI, −0.21 to −0.02; P =0.020), and Action Research Arm Test at postintervention (95% CI, 0.8–7.3; P =0.015) and 1-month follow-up (95% CI, 0.6–8.4; P =0.025). Only the active stimulation condition was associated with (1) statistically significant within-group benefit on all outcomes at 1-month follow-up and (2) improvement exceeding minimal detectable change, as well as minimal clinically significant difference,Abstract : Background and Purpose—: A sensory-based intervention called peripheral nerve stimulation can enhance outcomes of motor training for stroke survivors with mild-to-moderate hemiparesis. Further research is needed to establish whether this paired intervention can have benefit in cases of severe impairment (almost no active movement). Methods—: Subjects with chronic, severe poststroke hemiparesis (n=36) were randomized to receive 10 daily sessions of either active or sham stimulation (2 hours) immediately preceding intensive task-oriented training (4 hours). Upper extremity movement function was assessed using Fugl–Meyer Assessment (primary outcome measure), Wolf Motor Function Test, and Action Research Arm Test at baseline, immediately post intervention and at 1-month follow-up. Results—: Statistically significant difference between groups favored the active stimulation group on Fugl–Meyer at postintervention (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1–6.9; P =0.008) and 1-month follow-up (95% CI, 0.6–8.3; P =0.025), Wolf Motor Function Test at postintervention (95% CI, −0.21 to −0.02; P =0.020), and Action Research Arm Test at postintervention (95% CI, 0.8–7.3; P =0.015) and 1-month follow-up (95% CI, 0.6–8.4; P =0.025). Only the active stimulation condition was associated with (1) statistically significant within-group benefit on all outcomes at 1-month follow-up and (2) improvement exceeding minimal detectable change, as well as minimal clinically significant difference, on ≥1 outcomes at ≥1 time points after intervention. Conclusions—: After stroke, active peripheral nerve stimulation paired with intensive task–oriented training can effect significant improvement in severely impaired upper extremity movement function. Further confirmatory studies that consider a larger group, as well as longer follow-up, are needed. Clinical Trial Registration—: URL:http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02633215. Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Stroke. Volume 47:Issue 7(2016)
- Journal:
- Stroke
- Issue:
- Volume 47:Issue 7(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 47, Issue 7 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 47
- Issue:
- 7
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0047-0007-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2016-07
- Subjects:
- occupational therapy -- rehabilitation -- stroke -- upper extremity
Cerebrovascular disease -- Periodicals
Cerebral circulation -- Periodicals
616.81 - Journal URLs:
- http://ovidsp.tx.ovid.com/sp-3.16.0b/ovidweb.cgi?&S=GJCMFPNHCPDDNANKNCKKCFFBNGMHAA00&Browse=Toc+Children%7cYES%7cS.sh.15204_1441956414_76.15204_1441956414_88.15204_1441956414_96%7c411%7c50 ↗
http://www.stroke.ahajournals.org/ ↗
http://stroke.ahajournals.org/ ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗
http://www.lww.com/Product/0039-2499 ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.012671 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0039-2499
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 8474.900000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 28.xml