Spatialization of the SNOWPACK snow model for the Canadian Arctic to assess Peary caribou winter grazing conditions. (4th March 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ouellet, F.; Langlois, A.; Blukacz-Richards, E. A.; Johnson, C. A.; Royer, A.; Neave, E.; Larter, N. C.
• Is Part Of: Physical geography. Volume 38:Number 2(2017)
• Page Start: 143
• Page End: 158
• Publication Date: 2017-03-04
• Subjects: Snow -- caribou -- grazing conditions -- Arctic -- climate change impacts; Physical geography -- Periodicals; 910.02
• DOI: 10.1080/02723646.2016.1274200
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0272-3646

Abstract

Abstract: Peary caribou is the northernmost designatable unit for caribou species, and its population has declined by about 70% over the last three generations. The Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada identified difficult grazing conditions through the snow cover as being the most significant factor contributing to this decline. This study focuses on a spatially explicit assessment tool using snow model simulations (Swiss SNOWPACK model driven in an off-line mode by spatialized meteorological forcing data generated by the Canadian Regional Climate Model) to characterize snow conditions for Peary caribou grazing in the Canadian Arctic. The life cycle of Peary caribou has been subdivided into three critical periods: summer foraging and fall breeding (July–October), winter foraging (November–March), and spring calving (April–June). Winter snow conditions are analyzed and snow simulations compared to Peary caribou island counts to identify a snow parameter that could potentially act as a proxy for grazing conditions and explain fluctuations in Peary caribou numbers. This analysis concludes that caribou counts are affected by simulated snow density values >300 kg m −3 . A software tool mapping possibly favorable and unfavorable grazing conditions based on snow is proposed at a regional scale across the Canadian Arctic Archipelago. Specific output examples are given to show the utility of the tool, mapping pixels with cumulative snow thickness above densities of 300 kg m −3, where cumulative seasonal thicknesses >7000 cm are considered unfavorable.