Freestanding midwifery units: Maternal and neonatal outcomes following transfer. (March 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Freestanding midwifery units: Maternal and neonatal outcomes following transfer. (March 2017)
- Main Title:
- Freestanding midwifery units: Maternal and neonatal outcomes following transfer
- Authors:
- Monk, Amy R.
Grigg, Celia P.
Foureur, Maralyn
Tracy, Mark
Tracy, Sally K. - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: the viability of freestanding midwifery units in Australia is restricted, due to concerns over their safety, particularly for women and babies who, require transfer. Aim: to compare the maternal and neonatal birth outcomes of women who planned, to give birth at freestanding midwifery units and subsequently, transferred to a tertiary maternity unit to the maternal and neonatal, outcomes of a low-risk cohort of women who planned to give birth in, tertiary maternity unit. Methods: a descriptive study compared two groups of women with low-risk singleton, pregnancies who were less than 28 weeks pregnant at booking: women who, planned to give birth at a freestanding midwifery unit ( n =494) who, transferred to a tertiary maternity unit during the antenatal, intrapartum or postnatal periods ( n =260) and women who planned to give, birth at a tertiary maternity unit ( n =3157). Primary outcomes were mode, of birth, Apgar score of less than 7 at 5 minutes and admission to, special care nursery or neonatal intensive care. Key findings: the proportion of women who experienced a caesarean section was lower, among the freestanding midwifery unit women who transferred during the, intrapartum/postnatal period compared to women in the tertiary maternity, unit group (16.1% versus 24.8% respectively). Other outcomes were, comparable between the cohorts. Rates of primary outcomes in relation to, stage of transfer varied when stratified by parity. discussion: theseAbstract: Background: the viability of freestanding midwifery units in Australia is restricted, due to concerns over their safety, particularly for women and babies who, require transfer. Aim: to compare the maternal and neonatal birth outcomes of women who planned, to give birth at freestanding midwifery units and subsequently, transferred to a tertiary maternity unit to the maternal and neonatal, outcomes of a low-risk cohort of women who planned to give birth in, tertiary maternity unit. Methods: a descriptive study compared two groups of women with low-risk singleton, pregnancies who were less than 28 weeks pregnant at booking: women who, planned to give birth at a freestanding midwifery unit ( n =494) who, transferred to a tertiary maternity unit during the antenatal, intrapartum or postnatal periods ( n =260) and women who planned to give, birth at a tertiary maternity unit ( n =3157). Primary outcomes were mode, of birth, Apgar score of less than 7 at 5 minutes and admission to, special care nursery or neonatal intensive care. Key findings: the proportion of women who experienced a caesarean section was lower, among the freestanding midwifery unit women who transferred during the, intrapartum/postnatal period compared to women in the tertiary maternity, unit group (16.1% versus 24.8% respectively). Other outcomes were, comparable between the cohorts. Rates of primary outcomes in relation to, stage of transfer varied when stratified by parity. discussion: these descriptive results support the provision of care in freestanding, midwifery units as an alternative to tertiary maternity units for women, with low risk pregnancies at the time of booking. A larger study, powered, to determine statistical significance of any differences in outcomes, is, required. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Midwifery. Volume 46(2017)
- Journal:
- Midwifery
- Issue:
- Volume 46(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 46, Issue 2017 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 46
- Issue:
- 2017
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0046-2017-0000
- Page Start:
- 24
- Page End:
- 28
- Publication Date:
- 2017-03
- Subjects:
- Childbirth -- Transfer -- Freestanding midwifery unit -- Tertiary Hospital -- Place of birth -- Midwifery
Midwifery -- Periodicals
Midwifery -- Periodicals
Sages-femmes -- Périodiques
Midwifery
Periodicals
Electronic journals
618.2005 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/02666138 ↗
http://www.idealibrary.com/links/toc/midw/ ↗
http://www.harcourt-international.com/journals/midw/ ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=0266-6138;screen=info;ECOIP ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.midw.2017.01.006 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0266-6138
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 5761.449220
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 1648.xml