Comparing Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infection Prevention Programs Between Veterans Affairs Nursing Homes and Non–Veterans Affairs Nursing Homes. (5th December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mody, Lona; Greene, M. Todd; Saint, Sanjay; Meddings, Jennifer; Trautner, Barbara W.; Wald, Heidi L.; Crnich, Christopher; Banaszak-Holl, Jane; McNamara, Sara E.; King, Beth J.; Hogikyan, Robert; Edson, Barbara S.; Krein, Sarah L.
• Is Part Of: Infection control and hospital epidemiology. Volume 38:Number 3(2017)
• Page Start: 287
• Page End: 293
• Publication Date: 2016-12-05
• Subjects: Nosocomial infections -- Epidemiology -- Periodicals; Health facilities -- Sanitation -- Periodicals; Hospital buildings -- Sanitation -- Periodicals; Cross Infection -- Periodicals; Epidemiology -- Periodicals; Hospitals -- Periodicals; Infection Control -- Periodicals; 614.44
• DOI: 10.1017/ice.2016.279
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0899-823X

Abstract

Abstract : OBJECTIVE: The impact of healthcare system integration on infection prevention programs is unknown. Using catheter-associated urinary tract infection (CAUTI) prevention as an example, we hypothesize that US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) nursing homes have a more robust infection prevention infrastructure due to integration and centralization compared with non–VA nursing homes. SETTING: VA and non-VA nursing homes participating in the AHRQ Safety Program for Long-Term Care collaborative. METHODS: Nursing homes provided baseline information about their infection prevention programs to assess strengths and gaps related to CAUTI prevention via a needs assessment questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 353 of 494 nursing homes from 41 states (71%; 47 VA and 306 non-VA facilities) responded. VA nursing homes reported more hours per week devoted to infection prevention-related activities (31 vs 12 hours; P <.001) and were more likely to have committees that reviewed healthcare-associated infections. Compared with non-VA facilities, a higher percentage of VA nursing homes reported tracking CAUTI rates (94% vs 66%; P <.001), sharing CAUTI data with leadership (94% vs 70%; P =.014) and with nursing personnel (85% vs 56%, P =.003). However, fewer VA nursing homes reported having policies for appropriate catheter use (64% vs 81%; P =.004) and catheter insertion (83% vs 94%; P =.004). CONCLUSIONS: Among nursing homes participating in an AHRQ-funded collaborative, VA and non-VA nursing homes differed in their approach to CAUTI prevention. Best practices from both settings should be applied universally to create an optimal infection prevention program within emerging integrated healthcare systems. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2017;38:287–293