BMI was found to be a consistent determinant related to misreporting of energy, protein and potassium intake using self-report and duplicate portion methods. Issue 4 (11th October 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Trijsburg, Laura; Geelen, Anouk; Hollman, Peter CH; Hulshof, Paul JM; Feskens, Edith JM; van't Veer, Pieter; Boshuizen, Hendriek C; de Vries, Jeanne HM
• Is Part Of: Public health nutrition. Volume 20:Issue 4(2017)
• Page Start: 598
• Page End: 607
• Publication Date: 2016-10-11
• Subjects: Determinants of misreporting, -- Dietary intake assessment, -- Biomarkers of intake, -- Doubly labelled water, -- Duplicate portion; Nutrition -- Periodicals; Nutrition policy -- Periodicals; Public health -- Periodicals; 613.2
• DOI: 10.1017/S1368980016002743
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1368-9800

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: As misreporting, mostly under-reporting, of dietary intake is a generally known problem in nutritional research, we aimed to analyse the association between selected determinants and the extent of misreporting by the duplicate portion method (DP), 24 h recall (24hR) and FFQ by linear regression analysis using the biomarker values as unbiased estimates. Design: For each individual, two DP, two 24hR, two FFQ and two 24 h urinary biomarkers were collected within 1·5 years. Also, for sixty-nine individuals one or two doubly labelled water measurements were obtained. The associations of basic determinants (BMI, gender, age and level of education) with misreporting of energy, protein and K intake of the DP, 24hR and FFQ were evaluated using linear regression analysis. Additionally, associations between other determinants, such as physical activity and smoking habits, and misreporting were investigated. Setting: The Netherlands. Subjects: One hundred and ninety-seven individuals aged 20–70 years. Results: Higher BMI was associated with under-reporting of dietary intake assessed by the different dietary assessment methods for energy, protein and K, except for K by DP. Men tended to under-report protein by the DP, FFQ and 24hR, and persons of older age under-reported K but only by the 24hR and FFQ. When adjusted for the basic determinants, the other determinants did not show a consistent association with misreporting of energy or nutrients and by the different dietary assessment methods. Conclusions: As BMI was the only consistent determinant of misreporting, we conclude that BMI should always be taken into account when assessing and correcting dietary intake.