Sustainability of the grizzly bear hunt in British Columbia, Canada. Issue 2 (25th November 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Mclellan, Bruce N.; Mowat, Garth; Hamilton, Tony; Hatter, Ian
• Is Part Of: Journal of wildlife management. Volume 81:Issue 2(2017)
• Page Start: 218
• Page End: 229
• Publication Date: 2016-11-25
• Subjects: British Columbia -- demography -- grizzly bear -- hunting -- overkill -- population model -- sustainable harvest -- Ursus arctos; Wildlife management -- Periodicals; Zoology -- Periodicals; 333.954
• DOI: 10.1002/jwmg.21189
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-541X

Abstract

ABSTRACT: The sustainability of the grizzly bear ( Ursus arctos ) hunt in British Columbia, Canada has been questioned and is a high profile issue, particularly in the media. To investigate the hypothesis that the hunt is unsustainable, we examined the sustainable human‐caused mortality rate for grizzly bears using recent data on vital rates and population projection models and compare these to rates used by the management agency; examined the age and sex ratio of the kill and how the sex ratio changes with age for the entire province, each population unit, and cohorts born each year between 1977 and 1990; summarized population density estimates in hunted population units in British Columbia and compared these to unhunted areas in adjacent jurisdictions; and reviewed case studies of population units that have been highlighted as most likely to have had unsustainable kill levels. Because the natural mortality rate of adult grizzly bears is 1–2% and lower than was estimated when sustainable human‐caused mortality targets were developed, estimated sustainable kill rates are 4–10%, and generally higher than the 4–6% used in British Columbia. We estimated that males have been 3–4 times more vulnerable to being killed by hunters than females, yet males dominate the kill at all ages and the proportion of males increased with age, which is opposite of what is predicted for a heavily hunted population. The average age of female and male grizzly bears killed by hunters increased from 7.1 years and 7.4 years, respectively, in the 1980s to 7.7 years and 8.7 years, respectively, in the 2000s. An average of 107.4 females and 204.9 males per cohort born between 1977 and 1990 were eventually killed by people and recorded, suggesting that many more females than males died for unknown reasons. There have been more population inventories of grizzly bears in British Columbia than in any other jurisdiction. The average density estimate of 21 inventories in hunted areas without salmon ( Oncorhynchus spp.) in British Columbia (31.2 bears/1, 000 km 2 ) was as high as or higher than nearby unhunted areas. The case studies had the highest kill densities or among the highest kill rates in the province and hunting targets were commonly exceeded and seasons closed or the hunter kill target reduced. Although population inventories in these areas found moderate or even high densities of bears, some are now in decline. Hunter kill data from declining populations had a high proportion of males and these were older, demonstrating that these indices of kill rates are sometimes unreliable. Although more population density, trend, and vital rate measurements would be beneficial, the hypothesis that the grizzly bear hunt has been unsustainable was not supported by our investigation of available information. © 2016 The Wildlife Society. Abstract : We report that the grizzly bear population across the 800, 000 km 2 of occupied habitat in British Columbia has likely been harvested sustainably. Because population sizes and recruitment rates cannot be precisely estimated over such a large area, we recommend harvest targets continue to be set conservatively.