A Framework for Modeling the Interaction of Syntactic Processing and Eye Movement Control. (16th May 2013)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Engelmann, Felix; Vasishth, Shravan; Engbert, Ralf; Kliegl, Reinhold
• Is Part Of: Topics in cognitive science. Volume 5:Number 3(2013:Jul.)
• Page Start: 452
• Page End: 474
• Publication Date: 2013-05-16
• Subjects: Sentence comprehension -- Eye movements -- Reading -- Parsing difficulty -- Working memory -- Surprisal -- Computational modeling; Cognitive science -- Periodicals; Cognitive Science -- Periodicals; 153.05
• DOI: 10.1111/tops.12026
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1756-8757

Abstract

Abstract: We explore the interaction between oculomotor control and language comprehension on the sentence level using two well‐tested computational accounts of parsing difficulty. Previous work (Boston, Hale, Vasishth, & Kliegl, 2011) has shown that surprisal (Hale, 2001; Levy, 2008) and cue‐based memory retrieval (Lewis & Vasishth, 2005) are significant and complementary predictors of reading time in an eyetracking corpus. It remains an open question how the sentence processor interacts with oculomotor control. Using a simple linking hypothesis proposed in Reichle, Warren, and McConnell (2009), we integrated both measures with the eye movement model EMMA (Salvucci, 2001) inside the cognitive architecture ACT‐R (Anderson et al., 2004). We built a reading model that could initiate short "Time Out regressions" (Mitchell, Shen, Green, & Hodgson, 2008) that compensate for slow postlexical processing. This simple interaction enabled the model to predict the re‐reading of words based on parsing difficulty. The model was evaluated in different configurations on the prediction of frequency effects on the Potsdam Sentence Corpus. The extension of EMMA with postlexical processing improved its predictions and reproduced re‐reading rates and durations with a reasonable fit to the data. This demonstration, based on simple and independently motivated assumptions, serves as a foundational step toward a precise investigation of the interaction between high‐level language processing and eye movement control.