Test–retest Reliability in Reporting the Pain Induced by a Pain Provocation Test: Further Validation of a Novel Approach for Pain Drawing Acquisition and Analysis. Issue 2 (15th March 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Test–retest Reliability in Reporting the Pain Induced by a Pain Provocation Test: Further Validation of a Novel Approach for Pain Drawing Acquisition and Analysis. Issue 2 (15th March 2016)
- Main Title:
- Test–retest Reliability in Reporting the Pain Induced by a Pain Provocation Test: Further Validation of a Novel Approach for Pain Drawing Acquisition and Analysis
- Authors:
- Leoni, Diego
Falla, Deborah
Heitz, Carolin
Capra, Gianpiero
Clijsen, Ron
Egloff, Michele
Cescon, Corrado
Baeyens, Jean‐Pierre
Barbero, Marco - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: Pain drawings (PD) are frequently used in research to illustrate the pain response to pain provocation tests. However, there is a lack of data on the reliability in defining the extent and location of pain. We investigated the test–retest reliability in reporting an acute painful sensation induced by a pain provocation test using a novel approach for PD acquisition and analysis in healthy volunteers. Methods: Forty healthy volunteers participated. Each participant underwent 2 upper limb neurodynamic tests 1 (ULNT1), once to the point of pain onset (PO) and once until the point of submaximal pain (SP). After each ULNT1, participants completed 2 consecutive PD with an interval of 1 minute. Custom software was used to quantify the pain extent and analyze the pain overlap. The test–retest reliability of pain extent was examined using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC2, 1 ) and Bland–Altman plots. Pain location reliability was examined using the Jaccard similarity coefficient (JSC). Results: The ICC values for PO and SP were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96–0.99) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95–0.98), respectively. The mean difference and 95% limits of agreement (± 1.96 SD) in the Bland–Altman plots were 14 pixels (−1080;1110) for PO, and 145 (−1610;1900) for SP. The median JSCs (Q1;Q3) were 0.73 (0.64;0.80) for PO and 0.76 (0.65;0.79) for SP. Conclusions: Pain drawings is a reliable instrument to investigate pain extent and pain location in healthy individuals experiencingAbstract: Background: Pain drawings (PD) are frequently used in research to illustrate the pain response to pain provocation tests. However, there is a lack of data on the reliability in defining the extent and location of pain. We investigated the test–retest reliability in reporting an acute painful sensation induced by a pain provocation test using a novel approach for PD acquisition and analysis in healthy volunteers. Methods: Forty healthy volunteers participated. Each participant underwent 2 upper limb neurodynamic tests 1 (ULNT1), once to the point of pain onset (PO) and once until the point of submaximal pain (SP). After each ULNT1, participants completed 2 consecutive PD with an interval of 1 minute. Custom software was used to quantify the pain extent and analyze the pain overlap. The test–retest reliability of pain extent was examined using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC2, 1 ) and Bland–Altman plots. Pain location reliability was examined using the Jaccard similarity coefficient (JSC). Results: The ICC values for PO and SP were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.96–0.99) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95–0.98), respectively. The mean difference and 95% limits of agreement (± 1.96 SD) in the Bland–Altman plots were 14 pixels (−1080;1110) for PO, and 145 (−1610;1900) for SP. The median JSCs (Q1;Q3) were 0.73 (0.64;0.80) for PO and 0.76 (0.65;0.79) for SP. Conclusions: Pain drawings is a reliable instrument to investigate pain extent and pain location in healthy individuals experiencing an acute painful sensation induced by a pain provocation test. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Pain practice. Volume 17:Issue 2(2017:Feb.)
- Journal:
- Pain practice
- Issue:
- Volume 17:Issue 2(2017:Feb.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 17, Issue 2 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 17
- Issue:
- 2
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0017-0002-0000
- Page Start:
- 176
- Page End:
- 184
- Publication Date:
- 2016-03-15
- Subjects:
- pain drawing -- reliability -- pain extent -- pain location -- electronic acquisition
Pain -- Treatment -- Periodicals
616.0472 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/%28ISSN%291533-2500 ↗
http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/member/institutions/issuelist.asp?journal=ppr ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org ↗
http://firstsearch.oclc.org/journal=1530-7085;screen=info;ECOIP ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/papr.12429 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1530-7085
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6333.807500
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 280.xml