An exploratory study into the application of psychological theories and therapies in Australian mental health occupational therapy practice: Challenges to occupation‐based practice. (17th May 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ashby, Samantha; Gray, Mel; Ryan, Susan; James, Carole
• Is Part Of: Australian occupational therapy journal. Volume 64:Number 1(2017:Feb.)
• Page Start: 24
• Page End: 32
• Publication Date: 2016-05-17
• Subjects: mental health -- occupational therapy -- professional identity -- psychiatry -- theory; Occupational therapy -- Periodicals; Occupational therapy -- Australia -- Periodicals; 615.8515
• DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12302
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0045-0766

Abstract

Abstract : Background: While legitimate practice tools have been the subject of debate within the profession, little attention has been paid to psychological frames of reference (PFsOR). Hence, this article explores the ways psychological theories and therapies shape occupation‐based practice in mental health settings. Methodology: Narrative inquiry methods and thematic analysis were used to explore the career stories of nine occupational therapists who had worked in mental health practice for more than five years. Findings: Respondents found it difficult to hold onto their occupational focus in the psychology‐dominated world of mental health practice. The main themes to emerge were (i) tension between occupation and psychology; (ii) overwhelming pressures to adopt PFsOR; (iii) resistance to PFsOR; and (iv) using PFsOR to enhance professional repertoires. Findings pointed to the need to ensure PFsOR include occupational considerations for occupation‐based practice in mental health. Conclusion: A occupation‐based perspective means balancing PFsOR with occupation‐based considerations, so service‐user issues are holistically addressed. There is a need to critically review occupational therapists' use of PFsOR lest their most visible practical actions appear psychologically based rather than occupation based.