An ecosystem‐based approach to marine risk assessment. Issue 1 (30th January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Holsman, Kirstin; Samhouri, Jameal; Cook, Geoffrey; Hazen, Elliott; Olsen, Erik; Dillard, Maria; Kasperski, Stephen; Gaichas, Sarah; Kelble, Christopher R.; Fogarty, Mike; Andrews, Kelly
• Is Part Of: Ecosystem health and sustainability. Volume 3:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2017-01-30
• Subjects: coupled natural–human systems -- ecosystem risk assessment -- ecosystem‐based management -- risk assessment -- socio‐ecological system; Ecosystem health -- Periodicals; Environmental health -- Periodicals; Environmental policy -- Periodicals; Environmental engineering -- Periodicals; Environmental ethics -- Periodicals; Ecosystem management -- Periodicals; Ecosystem management; Environmental engineering; Environmental ethics; Environmental health; Environmental policy; Periodicals; 577
• DOI: 10.1002/ehs2.1256
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2096-4129

Abstract

Abstract: Risk assessments quantify the probability of undesirable events along with their consequences. They are used to prioritize management interventions and assess tradeoffs, serving as an essential component of ecosystem‐based management (EBM). A central objective of most risk assessments for conservation and management is to characterize uncertainty and impacts associated with one or more pressures of interest. Risk assessments have been used in marine resource management to help evaluate the risk of environmental, ecological, and anthropogenic pressures on species or habitats including for data‐poor fisheries management (e.g., toxicity, probability of extinction, habitat alteration impacts). Traditionally, marine risk assessments focused on singular pressure‐response relationships, but recent advancements have included use of risk assessments in an EBM context, providing a method for evaluating the cumulative impacts of multiple pressures on multiple ecosystem components. Here, we describe a conceptual framework for ecosystem risk assessment (ERA), highlighting its role in operationalizing EBM, with specific attention to ocean management considerations. This framework builds on the ecotoxicological and conservation literature on risk assessment and includes recent advances that focus on risks posed by fishing to marine ecosystems. We review how examples of ERAs from the United States fit into this framework, explore the variety of analytical approaches that have been used to conduct ERAs, and assess the challenges and data gaps that remain. This review discusses future prospects for ERAs as EBM decision‐support tools, their expanded role in integrated ecosystem assessments, and the development of next‐generation risk assessments for coupled natural–human systems.