High-dimensional Canonical Forest. Issue 5 (24th March 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chen, Yu-Chuan; Ahn, Hongshik; Chen, James J.
• Is Part Of: Journal of statistical computation and simulation. Volume 87:Issue 5(2017)
• Page Start: 845
• Page End: 854
• Publication Date: 2017-03-24
• Subjects: Canonical Forest -- canonical linear discriminant analysis -- classification -- ensemble -- high-dimensional data -- Random Subspace; 62G99; Mathematical statistics -- Data processing -- Periodicals; Digital computer simulation -- Periodicals; 519.5028505
• DOI: 10.1080/00949655.2016.1231191
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-9655

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Recently, a new ensemble classification method named Canonical Forest (CF) has been proposed by Chen et al. [Canonical forest. Comput Stat. 2014;29:849–867]. CF has been proven to give consistently good results in many data sets and comparable to other widely used classification ensemble methods. However, CF requires an adopting feature reduction method before classifying high-dimensional data. Here, we extend CF to a high-dimensional classifier by incorporating a random feature subspace algorithm [Ho TK. The random subspace method for constructing decision forests. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1998;20:832–844]. This extended algorithm is called HDCF (high-dimensional CF) as it is specifically designed for high-dimensional data. We conducted an experiment using three data sets – gene imprinting, oestrogen, and leukaemia – to compare the performance of HDCF with several popular and successful classification methods on high-dimensional data sets, including Random Forest [Breiman L. Random forest. Mach Learn. 2001;45:5–32], CERP [Ahn H, et al. Classification by ensembles from random partitions of high-dimensional data. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2007;51:6166–6179], and support vector machines [Vapnik V. The nature of statistical learning theory. New York: Springer; 1995]. Besides the classification accuracy, we also investigated the balance between sensitivity and specificity for all these four classification methods.