Two-Way Regularized Fuzzy Clustering of Multiple Correspondence Analysis. (2nd January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kim, Sunmee; Choi, Ji Yeh; Hwang, Heungsun
• Is Part Of: Multivariate behavioral research. Volume 52:Number 1(2017)
• Page Start: 31
• Page End: 46
• Publication Date: 2017-01-02
• Subjects: Multiple correspondence analysis -- cluster-level heterogeneity -- regularized fuzzy clustering -- two-way clustering -- cross validation; Psychometrics -- Periodicals; Psychology, Experimental -- Periodicals; Psychology, Experimental; Psychometrics; Periodicals; 150.15195
• DOI: 10.1080/00273171.2016.1246996
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0027-3171

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Multiple correspondence analysis (MCA) is a useful tool for investigating the interrelationships among dummy-coded categorical variables. MCA has been combined with clustering methods to examine whether there exist heterogeneous subclusters of a population, which exhibit cluster-level heterogeneity. These combined approaches aim to classify either observations only (one-way clustering of MCA) or both observations and variable categories (two-way clustering of MCA). The latter approach is favored because its solutions are easier to interpret by providing explicitly which subgroup of observations is associated with which subset of variable categories. Nonetheless, the two-way approach has been built on hard classification that assumes observations and/or variable categories to belong to only one cluster. To relax this assumption, we propose two-way fuzzy clustering of MCA. Specifically, we combine MCA with fuzzy k -means simultaneously to classify a subgroup of observations and a subset of variable categories into a common cluster, while allowing both observations and variable categories to belong partially to multiple clusters. Importantly, we adopt regularized fuzzy k -means, thereby enabling us to decide the degree of fuzziness in cluster memberships automatically. We evaluate the performance of the proposed approach through the analysis of simulated and real data, in comparison with existing two-way clustering approaches.