Expressions of pathologic markers in PRP based chondrogenic differentiation of human adipose derived stem cells. Issue 1 (February 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pakfar, Arezou; Irani, Shiva; Hanaee-Ahvaz, Hana
• Is Part Of: Tissue & cell. Volume 49:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: 122
• Page End: 130
• Publication Date: 2017-02
• Subjects: ADSCs adipose-derived stem cells -- Col II Collagen II -- GAG glycosaminoglycan -- PRP Platelet-Rich Plasma -- IGF Insulin-like growth factor -- PDGF platelet-derived growth factor -- bFGF basic fibroblast growth factor -- VEGF vascular endothelial growth factor -- ECM extracellular matrix -- BGN biglycan -- PPP plasma poor platelet -- DDMB 1, 9-dimethylmethylene blue -- MMPs Matrix metalloproteinases -- OA osteoarthritic; Chondrogenesis -- PRP -- ADSCs -- VEGF -- VEGFR2 phosphorylation -- TNFα -- Calcification; Cytology -- Periodicals; 571.5
• DOI: 10.1016/j.tice.2016.11.001
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0040-8166

Abstract

Graphical abstract: Highlights: Angiogenic/inflammatory potential of PRP-based chondrogenically-differentiated cell was examined by monitoring the secretion of the growth factor, activation of the relevant receptor and cell-transmigration. PRP significantly decreases the angiogenic and inflammatory potentials of the chondrogenically differentiated cells, but did not inhibit it completely. PRP enhanced the mineralization and hypertrophic differentiation of the cells in the matrix of the macro pellet neotissues. PRP has no physiologic contribution to the integrity and functionality of the constructed tissue since significant portion of the synthesized GAG released out of the macro pellet. Abstract: Background: Optimization of the differentiation medium through using autologous factors such as PRP is of great consideration, but due to the complex, variable and undefined composition of PRP on one hand and lack of control over the absolute regulatory mechanisms in in vitro conditions or disrupted and different mechanisms in diseased tissue microenvironments in in vivo conditions on the other hand, it is complicated and rather unpredictable to get the desired effects of PRP making it inevitable to monitor the possible pathologic or undesired differentiation pathways and therapeutic effects of PRP. Therefore, in this study the probable potential of PRP on inducing calcification, inflammation and angiogenesis in chondrogenically-differentiated cells was investigated. Methods: The expressions of chondrogenic, inflammatory, osteogenic and angiogenic markers from TGFβ or PRP-treated cells during chondrogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs) was evaluated. Expressions of Collagen II (Col II), Aggrecan, Sox9 and Runx2 were quantified using q-RT PCR. Expression of Col II and X was investigated by immunocytochemistry as well. Glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) production was also determined by GAG assay. Possible angiogenic/inflammatory potential was determined by quantitatively measuring the secreted VEGF, TNFα and phosphorylated VEGFR2 via ELISA. In addition, the calcification of the construct was monitored by measuring ALP activity and calcium deposition. Results: Our data showed that PRP positively induced chondrogenesis; meanwhile the secretion of angiogenic and inflammatory markers was decreased. VEGFR2 phosphorylation and ALP activity had a decreasing trend, but tissue mineralization was enhanced upon treating with PRP. Conclusions: Although reduction in inflammatory/angiogenic potential of the chondrogenically differentiated constructs highlights the superior effectiveness of PRP in comparison to TGFβ for chondrogenic differentiation, yet further improvement of the PRP-based chondrogenic differentiation media is required to inhibit the production of angiogenic/inflammatory markers, calcification and the release of synthesized GAG out of the construct.