Structural validation as an input into seismic depth conversion to decrease assigned structural uncertainty. (February 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Totake, Yukitsugu; Butler, Robert W.H.; Bond, Clare E.
• Is Part Of: Journal of structural geology. Volume 95(2017:Feb.)
• Page Start: 32
• Page End: 47
• Publication Date: 2017-02
• Subjects: Structural validation -- Seismic interpretation -- Uncertainty -- Depth conversion -- Fold-thrust structure; Geology, Structural -- Periodicals; Géomorphologie structurale -- Périodiques; Geology, Structural; Periodicals; 551.805
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jsg.2016.12.007
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0191-8141

Abstract

Abstract: While the interpretation of seismic reflection imagery is powerful and well established for evaluating subsurface structures it is never perfectly accurate. Structural validation techniques are widely used to geometrically test geological interpretations of seismic reflection data. Commonly these techniques are performed on depth sections converted from seismic time-based data using velocity models. Velocity model choices in seismic depth conversion have an impact on the final depth image and hence the structural geometry of interpretations. The impact of these choices in depth conversion on structural validation is rarely examined. Here we explore how multiple versions of a depth section, converted using different velocity models, influence the performance of structural validations for a fold-thrust structure from the deep water Niger Delta. The example illustrates that a range of kinematic models can validate the depth-converted profiles, regardless of the depth conversion choice and are thus poor diagnostic tools. Area-depth-strain (ADS) analysis can constrain the choice both of a kinematic model and the depth conversion, provided the seismic data allow the detachment level and excess areas to be recognised. Incorporation of ADS analysis within an interpretation-depth conversion workflow helps reduce assigned uncertainty in depth conversion, the seismic interpretation, and in the implicit geological model. Highlights: Kinematic models can verify a range of depth-converted interpretations. Area-Depth-Strain (ADS) analysis narrows uncertainty in structural validation. Iterative modifications of depth-converted interpretation based on ADS can improve structural interpretation.