Distinguishing subpopulations of marijuana users with latent profile analysis. (1st March 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pearson, Matthew R.; Bravo, Adrian J.; Conner, Bradley T.
• Is Part Of: Drug and alcohol dependence. Volume 172(2017)
• Page Start: 1
• Page End: 8
• Publication Date: 2017-03-01
• Subjects: Marijuana use -- Negative marijuana consequences -- Protective behavioral strategies -- Social norms -- Identity -- Latent profile analysis -- Person-Centered analysis; Drug abuse -- Periodicals; Alcoholism -- Periodicals; 616.86
• DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2016.10.043
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0376-8716

Abstract

Highlights: We used latent profile analysis to determine distinct subgroups of marijuana users. We identified four latent classes differing in frequency of use and consequences. We found between-class differences on several putative risk/protective factors. College student marijuana users are a heterogeneous group with use patterns. Abstract: Background: Although marijuana is the most commonly used illicit drug in the United States, little is known about the effects of typical marijuana use patterns and whether there are distinct subgroups of marijuana users. Methods: The present study used latent profile analysis to determine the number of distinct subgroups of marijuana users in a large sample of college students ( n = 2129 past month marijuana users across 11 universities). We also examined how these distinct groups differ on several putative risk/protective factors (e.g., personality traits, perceptions of marijuana, and motives for using marijuana). Results: Using the Lo-Mendell-Rubin Likelihood Ratio Test, we identified four latent classes with the largest class consisting of infrequent marijuana users, and three other classes demonstrating increasingly frequent use and more negative consequences with the most severe class being the smallest class. We found the largest between-class differences (i.e., distinctions across classes) to be on identification with being a marijuana user and use of protective behavioral strategies (PBS), such that the heavier user classes showed higher identification with marijuana users and lower use of PBS. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that college student marijuana users are a heterogeneous group with different profiles of risk/protective factors and that those who use marijuana a few times per month are different from those who are near-daily or daily users. Our findings also serve as a call to action for the field to consider examining identification with being a marijuana user and the use of PBS in future marijuana studies.