Switching between two targets with non‐constant velocity profiles reveals shared internal model of target motion. (11th September 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hainque, E.; Apartis, E.; Daye, P. M.
• Editors: Munoz, Doug
• Is Part Of: European journal of neuroscience. Volume 44:Number 8(2016:Oct.)
• Page Start: 2622
• Page End: 2634
• Publication Date: 2016-09-11
• Subjects: catch‐up -- ocular motor -- saccades -- smooth pursuit; Nervous system -- Periodicals; 612.8
• DOI: 10.1111/ejn.13370
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0953-816X

Abstract

Abstract: Several experiments have shown that smooth pursuit and saccades interact while tracking an object moving across the visual scene. It was proposed two decades ago that the amplitude of saccades triggered during smooth pursuit ('catch‐up saccades') were corrected by a delayed sensory signal to account for the ongoing target displacement during catch‐up saccades. However, recent studies used targets with non‐constant velocity profiles and suggested that the correction of catch‐up saccade amplitude must be done through an internal model of target motion. It is widely accepted that an internal model of target motion is also used by the central nervous system (CNS) to cancel inherent delays between visual input and smooth pursuit motor output, ensuring accurate tracking of moving targets. Our study proposes a new paradigm in which the target switches unexpectedly from one target with a non‐constant periodic velocity profile to another with a non‐constant aperiodic velocity profile. Our results confirm the hypothesis that the CNS uses an internal model of target motion to correct catch‐up saccade amplitude. In addition, we reconcile the sensory delayed and the internal model of target motion hypotheses and show that a common internal model of target motion is shared within the CNS to control smooth pursuit and to correct catch‐up saccade amplitude. Abstract : This study uses a new paradigm in which a target switches unexpectedly from a non‐constant periodic velocity profile to a non‐constant aperiodic velocity profile. The analyses confirm that the central nervous system uses an internal model of target motion to correct catch‐up saccade amplitude. They also demonstrate that a common internal model of target motion is shared within the central nervous system to control smooth pursuit and to correct catch‐up saccade amplitude.