Equine Influenza and Tetanus Immunisation: Evaluation of Antibody Response and Safety of Equip® FT and Equip® F Administration after Reduction of the Primary Course Interval to 3 Weeks. (9th September 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Equine Influenza and Tetanus Immunisation: Evaluation of Antibody Response and Safety of Equip® FT and Equip® F Administration after Reduction of the Primary Course Interval to 3 Weeks. (9th September 2013)
- Main Title:
- Equine Influenza and Tetanus Immunisation: Evaluation of Antibody Response and Safety of Equip® FT and Equip® F Administration after Reduction of the Primary Course Interval to 3 Weeks
- Authors:
- Paillot, R.
Ons, E.
Besognet, B.
Slootmans, N.
Thomas, A.
Salt, J. - Abstract:
- Abstract : Aims: A 6‐week interval is currently recommended during the primary course of the equine influenza (EI) vaccines Equip® FT or Equip® F. This study aimed to evaluate immunogenicity and safety of a 3‐week accelerated interval in order to improve flexibility and to reduce the period of susceptibility to EI virus (EIV) infection. Methods: Three groups of 10 ponies were respectively vaccinated with the vaccine Equip® FT according to the recommended 6‐week V1–V2 interval (T02), Equip® F or Equip® FT according to an experimental accelerated 3‐week interval (T03 and T04, respectively). These groups were boosted (V3) with Equip® F 5 months after V2. Ten ponies in a control group were injected with saline (T01). The antibody response to the vaccine antigens (tetanus toxoid and EIV) were measured 2 weeks after V2 and V3 with the toxin binding inhibition test (ToBI) and single radial haemolysis (SRH), respectively. All animal work received ethical approval. Results: The accelerated schedule of immunisation was well tolerated. At both time points, in all vaccinated groups, SRH least squares means for A/eq/Borlange/91 and A/eq/Kentucky/98 antigens were well above 85 mm 2, a level described previously to provide clinical protection against homologous EIV strains. Non inferiority of SRH least square means were demonstrated at 2 weeks post V2 for both antigens for T03 and T04, and for A/eq/Kentucky/98 antigen in group T04 after V3. For tetanus, ToBI least squares means were 86.3Abstract : Aims: A 6‐week interval is currently recommended during the primary course of the equine influenza (EI) vaccines Equip® FT or Equip® F. This study aimed to evaluate immunogenicity and safety of a 3‐week accelerated interval in order to improve flexibility and to reduce the period of susceptibility to EI virus (EIV) infection. Methods: Three groups of 10 ponies were respectively vaccinated with the vaccine Equip® FT according to the recommended 6‐week V1–V2 interval (T02), Equip® F or Equip® FT according to an experimental accelerated 3‐week interval (T03 and T04, respectively). These groups were boosted (V3) with Equip® F 5 months after V2. Ten ponies in a control group were injected with saline (T01). The antibody response to the vaccine antigens (tetanus toxoid and EIV) were measured 2 weeks after V2 and V3 with the toxin binding inhibition test (ToBI) and single radial haemolysis (SRH), respectively. All animal work received ethical approval. Results: The accelerated schedule of immunisation was well tolerated. At both time points, in all vaccinated groups, SRH least squares means for A/eq/Borlange/91 and A/eq/Kentucky/98 antigens were well above 85 mm 2, a level described previously to provide clinical protection against homologous EIV strains. Non inferiority of SRH least square means were demonstrated at 2 weeks post V2 for both antigens for T03 and T04, and for A/eq/Kentucky/98 antigen in group T04 after V3. For tetanus, ToBI least squares means were 86.3 iu/mI for T02 and 45.9 iu/ml for T04 after V2 and 2.6 iu/ml for T02 and 2.2 iu/ml for T04 after V3. A level of 0.02 iu/ml has been described as being protective in various publications. Conclusion and practical relevance: A 3‐week accelerated primary course interval was well tolerated and serology results suggested good immunogenicity. Ethical animal research: The study was conducted under the Animal Health Trust Home Office Project License and with approval of the Zaventem Ethics Review Assessment team (Zoetis).Sources of funding: The study was sponsored by Pfizer/Zoetis Animal Health.Competing interests: Equip® FT is owned by Zoetis, who sponsored this study. Romain Paillot reports no conflict of interest. All other authors are employed by the study sponsor. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Equine veterinary journal. Volume 45(2013)Supplement 44
- Journal:
- Equine veterinary journal
- Issue:
- Volume 45(2013)Supplement 44
- Issue Display:
- Volume 45, Issue 44 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 45
- Issue:
- 44
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0045-0044-0000
- Page Start:
- 17
- Page End:
- 17
- Publication Date:
- 2013-09-09
- Subjects:
- Horses -- Diseases -- Periodicals
636.108905 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1001/(ISSN)2042-3306 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/evj/evj ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1111/evj.12145_41 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0425-1644
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3794.520000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 1842.xml