Discussion Group Composition and Deliberation Experience. Issue 2 (16th January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sumaktoyo, Nathanael Gratias; Nickerson, David W.; Keane, Michael J.
• Is Part Of: Journal of experimental political science. Volume 3:Issue 2(2016)
• Page Start: 164
• Page End: 173
• Publication Date: 2017-01-16
• Subjects: Deliberative democracy, -- deliberative poll, -- gender, -- race, -- education, -- discussion, -- status; Political science -- Periodicals; Political science -- Research -- Periodicals; Political science -- Methodology -- Periodicals; 320.0724
• DOI: 10.1017/XPS.2016.6
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2052-2630

Abstract

Abstract: In order to encouragee broad participation in deliberative forums, it is important to understand how people from politically less powerful groups perceive the deliberative experience and how discussion group composition affects their experiences. Using data from 27 deliberative polls from 2004, we examine how four individual characteristics (sex, age, race, and education) and randomly assigned small group composition predict participants' attitudes about the deliberative experience. We find evidence that women, young people, non-whites, and those without college degree generally evaluate the experience positively, but find no evidence for the argument that including more people from these groups would lead to more positive deliberation experience for participants from the groups. That is, there is no interaction between minority status and group composition in predicting participants' evaluation of the deliberation process.