Fetal serum α‐1 microglobulin for renal function assessment: comparison with β2‐microglobulin and cystatin C. (14th May 2013)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Fetal serum α‐1 microglobulin for renal function assessment: comparison with β2‐microglobulin and cystatin C. (14th May 2013)
- Main Title:
- Fetal serum α‐1 microglobulin for renal function assessment: comparison with β2‐microglobulin and cystatin C
- Authors:
- Nguyen, Claire
Dreux, Sophie
Heidet, Laurence
Czerkiewicz, Isabelle
Salomon, Laurent J.
Guimiot, Fabien
Schmitz, Thomas
Tsatsaris, Vassilis
Boulot, Pierre
Rousseau, Thierry
Muller, Françoise - Abstract:
- ABSTRACT: Objective: To compare the prognostic value of fetal serum α 1‐microglobulin with that of β 2‐microglobulin and cystatin C for postnatal renal function. Method: Retrospective study of α 1‐microglobulin, β 2‐microglobulin, and cystatin C in fetal serum from 126 fetuses with congenital abnormalities of the kidney and urinary tract (73 and 53, respectively). Two groups were defined: group with normal renal function and group with renal failure. For live born infants, renal function was assessed on the basis of serum creatinine (cutoff 50 µmol/L) or glomerular filtration rate (cutoff 75 mL/min/1.73 m2) or both. In case of infant or fetal death, histological kidney lesions were considered. Results: Significant differences ( p < 0.001) were observed for the three markers between fetuses with good renal prognosis and those with renal failure (34.4 mg/L vs 67.6 mg/L for α 1‐microglobulin, respectively; 3.9 mg/L vs 7.35 mg/L, for β 2‐microglobulin, respectively; and 1.67 mg/L vs 2.12 mg/L for cystatin C, respectively). Areas under receiver operator curves were used to compare the three markers, 0.96, 0.90, and 0.74 for β 2‐microglobulin, α 1‐microglobulin, and cystatin C, respectively. Conclusion: Although α 1‐microglobulin is significantly different in fetuses with good renal prognosis and those with renal failure, overall, it is a less reliable prognostic marker than fetal serum β 2‐microglobulin. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Abstract : What's already known about thisABSTRACT: Objective: To compare the prognostic value of fetal serum α 1‐microglobulin with that of β 2‐microglobulin and cystatin C for postnatal renal function. Method: Retrospective study of α 1‐microglobulin, β 2‐microglobulin, and cystatin C in fetal serum from 126 fetuses with congenital abnormalities of the kidney and urinary tract (73 and 53, respectively). Two groups were defined: group with normal renal function and group with renal failure. For live born infants, renal function was assessed on the basis of serum creatinine (cutoff 50 µmol/L) or glomerular filtration rate (cutoff 75 mL/min/1.73 m2) or both. In case of infant or fetal death, histological kidney lesions were considered. Results: Significant differences ( p < 0.001) were observed for the three markers between fetuses with good renal prognosis and those with renal failure (34.4 mg/L vs 67.6 mg/L for α 1‐microglobulin, respectively; 3.9 mg/L vs 7.35 mg/L, for β 2‐microglobulin, respectively; and 1.67 mg/L vs 2.12 mg/L for cystatin C, respectively). Areas under receiver operator curves were used to compare the three markers, 0.96, 0.90, and 0.74 for β 2‐microglobulin, α 1‐microglobulin, and cystatin C, respectively. Conclusion: Although α 1‐microglobulin is significantly different in fetuses with good renal prognosis and those with renal failure, overall, it is a less reliable prognostic marker than fetal serum β 2‐microglobulin. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. Abstract : What's already known about this topic? Serum α 1‐microglobulin is considered as a good marker of postnatal renal function in children. We compared its value with those of fetal serum β 2‐microglobulin and cystatin C, which have been previously evaluated for prenatal diagnosis of congenital abnormalities of the kidney and urinary tract. What does this study add? Fetal serum α 1‐microglobulin was much less reliable than fetal serum β 2‐microglobulin in prognostic assessment of renal function. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Prenatal diagnosis. Volume 33:Number 8(2013:Aug.)
- Journal:
- Prenatal diagnosis
- Issue:
- Volume 33:Number 8(2013:Aug.)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 33, Issue 8 (2013)
- Year:
- 2013
- Volume:
- 33
- Issue:
- 8
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2013-0033-0008-0000
- Page Start:
- 775
- Page End:
- 781
- Publication Date:
- 2013-05-14
- Subjects:
- Prenatal diagnosis -- Periodicals
Fetus -- Diseases -- Diagnosis -- Periodicals
Electronic journals
618.32075 - Journal URLs:
- http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗
- DOI:
- 10.1002/pd.4128 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0197-3851
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6607.646000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 959.xml