Remating responses are consistent with male postcopulatory manipulation but not reinforcement in D. pseudoobscura. Issue 2 (20th December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Davis, Jeremy S.; Castillo, Dean M.; Moyle, Leonie C.
• Is Part Of: Ecology and evolution. Volume 7:Issue 2(2017:Feb.)
• Page Start: 507
• Page End: 515
• Publication Date: 2016-12-20
• Subjects: allopatry -- coevolution -- reproductive isolation -- sexual conflict -- speciation -- sympatry; Ecology -- Periodicals; Evolution -- Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1002/ece3.2628
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2045-7758

Abstract

Abstract: Reinforcement occurs when hybridization between closely related lineages produces low‐fitness offspring, prompting selection for elevated reproductive isolation specifically in areas of sympatry. Both premating and postmating prezygotic behaviors have been shown to be the target of reinforcing selection, but it remains unclear whether remating behaviors experience reinforcement, although they can also influence offspring identity and limit formation of hybrids. Here, we evaluated evidence for reinforcing selection on remating behaviors in Drosophila pseudoobscura, by comparing remating traits in females from populations historically allopatric and sympatric with Drosophila persimilis . We found that the propensity to remate was not higher in sympatric females, compared to allopatric females, regardless of whether the first mated male was heterospecific or conspecific. Moreover, remating behavior did not contribute to interspecific reproductive isolation among any population; that is, females showed no higher propensity to remate following a heterospecific first mating than following a conspecific first mating. Instead, we found that females are less likely to remate after initial matings with unfamiliar males, regardless of species identity. This is consistent with one scenario of postmating sexual conflict in which females are poorly defended against postcopulatory manipulation by males with whom they have not coevolved. Our results are generally inconsistent with reinforcement on remating traits and suggest that this behavior might be more strongly shaped by the consequences of local antagonistic male–female interactions than interactions with heterospecifics. Abstract : We evaluated evidence for reinforcing selection on female remating behaviors in D. pseudoobscura, by comparing females from populations historically allopatric and sympatric with D. persimilis . We found that the propensity to remate was not higher in sympatric females, as would be expected under reinforcement. Instead, females are generally less likely to remate after initial matings with unfamiliar males, regardless of species identity, consistent with females being poorly defended against postcopulatory manipulation by males with whom they have not coevolved.