Outcomes in chevron osteotomy for Hallux Valgus in a large cohort. (December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: van Groningen, Bart; van der Steen, M.C. (Marieke); Reijman, Max; Bos, Janneke; Hendriks, Johannes G.E.
• Is Part Of: Foot. Volume 29(2016)
• Page Start: 18
• Page End: 24
• Publication Date: 2016-12
• Subjects: Hallux valgus -- Chevron osteotomy -- Patient reported outcome measures -- Foot and ankle outcome score; Foot -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Foot -- Surgery -- Periodicals; Foot Diseases -- Periodicals; Foot -- surgery -- Periodicals; Pied -- Maladies -- Périodiques; Pied -- Chirurgie -- Périodiques; Pied -- Lésions et blessures -- Périodiques; Foot -- Diseases; Foot -- Surgery; Periodicals; Electronic journals; Electronic journals; 617.585005
• DOI: 10.1016/j.foot.2016.09.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0958-2592

Abstract

Highlights: Chevron osteotomy offers acceptable scores of the PROMs. Undercorrection and reoperation significantly lower scores on the FAOS. Increased attention on these surgical details may improve chevron outcomes. Abstract: Clinical and radiological related outcomes have been reported for Chevron osteotomy as correction for mild to moderate hallux valgus, but only for relatively small patient series. Moreover, evaluation of the patient's point of view has mostly been conducted by means of more physician-based outcome measures. The goal of this study was to evaluate the effect of the Chevron osteotomy for hallux valgus on patients' daily lives using the Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS) as a validated and a hallux valgus specific patient reported outcome measure (PROM). Secondary outcome measures were radiological correction, complication rate, and re-operations. All 438 Chevron procedures (336 patients), at two surgical hospital sites in the period between January 2010 and October 2014, were retrospectively evaluated with a follow-up of at least 6 months. Patients were invited to fill in a cross-sectional online FAOS. For the FAOS, a total response of 60% was achieved. The FAOS ranged between 71 and 88 with a follow-up of on average 36 months. Patients with an undercorrection of their hallux valgus (11.6% of the procedures) scored significantly lower on three subscales of the FAOS (range between 61 and 77 versus 72–84). Patients who had a reoperation (12.6% of the procedures) also scored significantly lower on four subscales: 58–100 versus 73–89. Postoperative radiological measurements improved significantly with a mean difference of 6.1 (5.9; 6.4) degrees for the intermetatarsal angle and 13.7 (13.0; 14.5) degrees for the hallux valgus angle. In this large study cohort, Chevron osteotomy for hallux valgus offers good PROM scores on FAOS. These scores were significantly lower in patients with radiological undercorrection or with a reoperation. Results of the FAOS appear to modulate with physician based outcomes and therapeutic incidents. Improvement of outcome may therefore well be possible by increased attention on these surgical details.