Flexing service schedules: Assessing the potential for demand-adaptive hybrid transit via a stated preference approach. (March 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Flexing service schedules: Assessing the potential for demand-adaptive hybrid transit via a stated preference approach. (March 2017)
- Main Title:
- Flexing service schedules: Assessing the potential for demand-adaptive hybrid transit via a stated preference approach
- Authors:
- Frei, Charlotte
Hyland, Michael
Mahmassani, Hani S. - Abstract:
- Highlights: Flexible, demand-adaptive transit services are intended for low-density areas. These services provide both local circulation and access to mileposts such as regional rail stations. Current mode usage has strong influence on likelihood of using flexible transit service. Waiting at one's origin is considerably less onerous than waiting at transit stop. Results inform the service design process for flexible transit and mobility services. Abstract: This paper assesses the demand for a flexible, demand-adaptive transit service, using the Chicago region as an example. We designed and implemented a stated-preference survey in order to (1) identify potential users of flexible transit, and (2) inform the service design of the flexible transit mode. Multinomial logit, mixed-logit, and panel mixed-logit choice models were estimated using the data obtained from the survey. The survey instrument employed a dp -efficient design and the Google Maps API to capture precise origins and destinations in order to create realistic choice scenarios. The stated-preference experiments offered respondents a choice between traditional transit, car, and a hypothetical flexible transit mode. Wait time, access time, travel time, service frequency, cost, and number of transfers varied across the choice scenarios. The choice model results indicate mode-specific values of in-vehicle travel time ranging between $16.3 per hour (car) and $21.1 per hour (flexible transit). The estimated value ofHighlights: Flexible, demand-adaptive transit services are intended for low-density areas. These services provide both local circulation and access to mileposts such as regional rail stations. Current mode usage has strong influence on likelihood of using flexible transit service. Waiting at one's origin is considerably less onerous than waiting at transit stop. Results inform the service design process for flexible transit and mobility services. Abstract: This paper assesses the demand for a flexible, demand-adaptive transit service, using the Chicago region as an example. We designed and implemented a stated-preference survey in order to (1) identify potential users of flexible transit, and (2) inform the service design of the flexible transit mode. Multinomial logit, mixed-logit, and panel mixed-logit choice models were estimated using the data obtained from the survey. The survey instrument employed a dp -efficient design and the Google Maps API to capture precise origins and destinations in order to create realistic choice scenarios. The stated-preference experiments offered respondents a choice between traditional transit, car, and a hypothetical flexible transit mode. Wait time, access time, travel time, service frequency, cost, and number of transfers varied across the choice scenarios. The choice model results indicate mode-specific values of in-vehicle travel time ranging between $16.3 per hour (car) and $21.1 per hour (flexible transit). The estimated value of walking time to transit is $25.9 per hour. The estimated value of waiting time at one's point of origin for a flexible transit vehicle is $11.3 per hour; this value is significantly lower than the disutility typically associated with waiting at a transit stop/station indicating that the 'at-home' pick-up option of flexible transit is a highly desirable feature. The choice model results also indicate that respondents who use active-transport modes or public transit for their current commute trip, or are bikeshare members, were significantly more likely to choose flexible and traditional transit than car commuters in the choice experiments. The implications of these and other relevant model results for the design and delivery of flexible, technology-enabled services are discussed. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Transportation research. Volume 76(2017)
- Journal:
- Transportation research
- Issue:
- Volume 76(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 76, Issue 2017 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 76
- Issue:
- 2017
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0076-2017-0000
- Page Start:
- 71
- Page End:
- 89
- Publication Date:
- 2017-03
- Subjects:
- Flexible transit -- Demand-adaptive transit -- Hybrid transit -- Mode choice -- Stated-preference survey -- Mobility services
Transportation -- Periodicals
Transportation -- Technological innovations -- Periodicals
388.011 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/0968090X ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.trc.2016.12.017 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0968-090X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 9026.274620
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 996.xml