Rational-experiential thinking style and rational intergroup cooperation: the moderating role of intergroup conflict / Estilos de pensamiento racional-experiencial y la cooperación intergrupal racional: el rol modulador del conflicto intergrupal. Issue 1 (2nd January 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Peñarroja, Vicente; Serrano, Miguel A.; Gracia, Esther; Alacreu-Crespo, Adrián; González, Patricia; Martínez-Tur, Vicente
• Is Part Of: Revista de psicología social. Volume 32:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: 23
• Page End: 51
• Publication Date: 2017-01-02
• Subjects: experiential thinking style -- interactionist approach -- intergroup conflict -- rational intergroup cooperation -- rational thinking style; pensamiento experiencial -- enfoque interaccionista -- conflicto intergrupal -- cooperación intergrupal racional -- pensamiento racional; Social psychology -- Periodicals; Social psychology; Periodicals; 302
• DOI: 10.1080/02134748.2016.1248028
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0213-4748

Abstract

Abstract: Cooperative relationships between groups are difficult because of the high human capability to differentiate between in-group vs. out-group members. This obstacle exists even when the groups can obtain benefits for themselves from cooperation with other groups (rational cooperation). Based on an interactionist approach, the authors propose that personal (individual differences) and situational (conflicts) factors contribute to rational intergroup cooperation. The authors conducted a preliminary correlational study (Study 1) and an experimental investigation (Study 2). In Study 1, the authors examined, with 105 participants, the psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the Rational–Experiential Inventory (REI), measuring individual differences in information processing. In Study 2, the authors conducted an experimental investigation with 141 participants, testing the role of individual differences and conflict in intergroup rational cooperation. Findings of Study 1 showed that the scale has adequate psychometric properties. Results of Study 2 confirmed that the existence of both manipulated and perceived intergroup conflict reduces the magnitudes of the relationships between rational ability and rational cooperation. In addition, perceived intergroup conflict increased the magnitude of the links from experiential ability and experimental engagement to rational cooperation. Both individual differences and previous conflict have a role in predicting rational intergroup cooperation. According to the interactionist approach, personal and situational factors should be considered in the understanding of intergroup relationships.