Capillarity characters measurement and effects analysis in different permeability formations during waterflooding. (15th April 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Li, Ying; Li, Haitao; Chen, Shengnan; Mbia, Ernest; Wang, Ke; Ren, Houlin
• Is Part Of: Fuel. Volume 194(2017)
• Page Start: 129
• Page End: 143
• Publication Date: 2017-04-15
• Subjects: Dynamic capillarity -- Different permeability -- Waterflooding -- Effect -- Numerical simulations; Fuel -- Periodicals; Coal -- Periodicals; Coal; Fuel; Periodicals; 662.6
• DOI: 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.12.088
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0016-2361

Abstract

Highlights: Both static and dynamic capillarity characters are examined experimentally. Sensitivity analysis in different permeability cases are performed. The underlying mechanism of capillarity in production is explored. A method to clarify the condition where dynamic capillarity should be considered. Abstract: In the description of multiphase flow in porous media, dynamic capillarity is typically ignored. While some studies suggest that dynamic capillarity can be ignored in high permeability rock, it cannot be overlooked in low permeability rock. In this work, dynamic capillarity, in various permeability formations, was investigated through specially designed experiments and the impact on field production is simulated. First, capillarity characters (capillary pressure-saturation relationships and relative permeability curves) were obtained during the static and dynamic waterflooding process conducted in different permeability core samples under in-situ reservoir conditions. The dynamic coefficients were calculated locally and compared. Then experimental results were subjected to sensitivity analyses, through numerical simulation studies using CMG (IMEX), to determine the dynamic capillary effects on different permeability cases. The results show that (a) a low permeability formation constitutes a much larger dynamic coefficient, thus resulting in a significant difference between dynamic and static capillary pressures; (b) the lower the rock permeability, the larger the difference between static and dynamic relative permeability curves; (c) the dynamic capillary pressure in low permeability formations, compared with static capillary pressure, can be notably large, causing irregular differences in phase behavior and pressure distribution. This work demonstrates the importance of considering dynamic capillarity in low permeability reservoirs.