A critical review of the ESCAPE project for estimating long-term health effects of air pollution. (February 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lipfert, Frederick W.
• Is Part Of: Environment international. Volume 99(2017:Feb.)
• Page Start: 87
• Page End: 96
• Publication Date: 2017-02
• Subjects: Air pollution -- Epidemiology -- Long-term -- Mortality -- Exposure analysis; Environmental protection -- Periodicals; Environmental health -- Periodicals; Environmental monitoring -- Periodicals; Environmental Monitoring -- Periodicals; Environnement -- Protection -- Périodiques; Hygiène du milieu -- Périodiques; Environnement -- Surveillance -- Périodiques; Environmental health; Environmental monitoring; Environmental protection; Periodicals; 333.705
• DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2016.11.028
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0160-4120

Abstract

Abstract: The European Study of Cohorts for Air Pollution Effects (ESCAPE) is a13-nation study of long-term health effects of air pollution based on subjects pooled from up to 22 cohorts that were intended for other purposes. Twenty-five papers have been published on associations of various health endpoints with long-term exposures to NOx, NO2, traffic indicators, PM10, PM2.5 and PM constituents including absorbance (elemental carbon). Seven additional ESCAPE papers found moderate correlations (R2 = 0.3–0.8) between measured air quality and estimates based on land-use regression that were used; personal exposures were not considered. I found no project summaries or comparisons across papers; here I conflate the 25 ESCAPE findings in the context of other recent European epidemiology studies. Because one ESCAPE cohort contributed about half of the subjects, I consider it and the other 18 cohorts separately to compare their contributions to the combined risk estimates. I emphasize PM2.5 and confirm the published hazard ratio of 1.14 (1.04–1.26) per 10 μg/m3 for all-cause mortality. The ESCAPE papers found 16 statistically significant (p < 0.05) risks among the125 pollutant-endpoint combinations; 4 each for PM2.5 and PM10, 1 for PM absorbance, 5 for NO2, and 2 for traffic. No PM constituent was consistently significant. No significant associations were reported for cardiovascular mortality; low birthrate was significant for all pollutants except PM absorbance. Based on associations with PM2.5, I find large differences between all-cause death estimates and the sum of specific-cause death estimates. Scatterplots of PM2.5 mortality risks by cause show no consistency across the 18 cohorts, ostensibly because of the relatively few subjects. Overall, I find the ESCAPE project inconclusive and I question whether the efforts required to estimate exposures for small cohorts were worthwhile. I suggest that detailed studies of the large cohort using historical exposures and additional cardiovascular risk factors might be productive. Highlights: ESCAPE: pooled epidemiological analyses of up to 19 cohorts in 13 countries 25 papers on associations of health indicators with up to 8 air pollutants One cohort with about half of the total subjects was considered separately. 16 of 125 pollutant-health endpoint combinations were significant (p < 0.05). Significant mortality associations: CVD, none; total, PM2.5 (only species tested)