Implementing Health Impact Assessment Programs in State Health Agencies: Lessons Learned From Pilot Programs, 2009-2011. Issue 6 (November 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Goff, Nancy; Wyss, Kerry; Wendel, Arthur; Jarris, Paul
• Is Part Of: Journal of public health management and practice. Volume 22:Issue 6(2016)
• Page Start: E8
• Page End: E13
• Publication Date: 2016-11
• Subjects: capacity building -- Health Impact Assessment -- local health department -- state health agency; Public health administration -- United States -- Periodicals; 253.6
• DOI: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000000392
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1078-4659

Abstract

Abstract : Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. This article provides ways to identify the role of state health agencies in building capacity for conducting Health Impact Assessments (HIAs) and the key components of initiatives that produced effective HIAs and HIA programs. Abstract : Context: Health Impact Assessment (HIA) has emerged as a promising tool to integrate health considerations into decision making. The growth and success of HIA practice in the United States will be dependent on building the capacity of practitioners. Objective: This article seeks to identify the role of state health agencies (SHAs) in building capacity for conducting HIAs and the key components of initiatives that produced effective HIAs and HIA programs. The authors proposed to answer 3 research questions: (1) What can be the role of the SHA in HIA? (2) What are the characteristics of successful state HIA programs? and (3) What are some effective strategies for building capacity for HIA in SHAs and local health departments? Design: The authors reviewed program reports from the ASTHO's pilot state health agencies (California, Minnesota, Oregon, and Wisconsin) that, between 2009 and 2011, created HIA programs to provide HIA training, conduct HIAs, and build practitioner networks. Main Outcome Measures: Program reports were examined for shared themes on the role of SHAs in a statewide HIA initiative, the characteristics of successful programs, and effective strategies for building capacity. Results: Despite differences among the programs, many shared themes existed. These include stressing the importance of a basic, sustained infrastructure for HIA practice; leveraging existing programs and networks; and working in partnership with diverse stakeholders. Conclusions: SHAs can build capacity for HIA, and SHAs can both lead and support the completion of individual HIAs. States and territories interested in starting comprehensive statewide HIA initiatives could consider implementing the strategies identified by the pilot programs.