Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: current concepts, indications and limitations for clinical practice and research. Issue 1 (February 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bornstein, Michael M.; Horner, Keith; Jacobs, Reinhilde
• Is Part Of: Periodontology 2000. Volume 73:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: 51
• Page End: 72
• Publication Date: 2017-02
• Subjects: Periodontics -- Periodicals; 617.632
• DOI: 10.1111/prd.12161
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0906-6713

Abstract

Abstract: Diagnostic radiology is an essential component of treatment planning in the field of implant dentistry. This narrative review will present current concepts for the use of cone beam computed tomography imaging, before and after implant placement, in daily clinical practice and research. Guidelines for the selection of three‐dimensional imaging will be discussed, and limitations will be highlighted. Current concepts of radiation dose optimization, including novel imaging modalities using low‐dose protocols, will be presented. For preoperative cross‐sectional imaging, data are still not available which demonstrate that cone beam computed tomography results in fewer intraoperative complications such as nerve damage or bleeding incidents, or that implants inserted using preoperative cone beam computed tomography data sets for planning purposes will exhibit higher survival or success rates. The use of cone beam computed tomography following the insertion of dental implants should be restricted to specific postoperative complications, such as damage of neurovascular structures or postoperative infections in relation to the maxillary sinus. Regarding peri‐implantitis, the diagnosis and severity of the disease should be evaluated primarily based on clinical parameters and on radiological findings based on periapical radiographs (two dimensional). The use of cone beam computed tomography scans in clinical research might not yield any evident beneficial effect for the patient included. As many of the cone beam computed tomography scans performed for research have no direct therapeutic consequence, dose optimization measures should be implemented by using appropriate exposure parameters and by reducing the field of view to the actual region of interest.