Aerobic exercise and vascular cognitive impairment: A randomized controlled trial. (15th November 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Liu-Ambrose, Teresa; Best, John R.; Davis, Jennifer C.; Eng, Janice J.; Lee, Philip E.; Jacova, Claudia; Boyd, Lara A.; Brasher, Penelope M.; Munkacsy, Michelle; Cheung, Winnie; Hsiung, Ging-Yuek R.
• Is Part Of: Neurology. Volume 87:Number 20(2016)
• Publication Date: 2016-11-15
• Subjects: Neurology -- Periodicals; Neurology -- Periodicals; Neurologie -- Périodiques; 616.8
• DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003332
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0028-3878

Abstract

Abstract : Objective: To assess the efficacy of a progressive aerobic exercise training program on cognitive and everyday function among adults with mild subcortical ischemic vascular cognitive impairment (SIVCI). Methods: This was a proof-of-concept single-blind randomized controlled trial comparing a 6-month, thrice-weekly, progressive aerobic exercise training program (AT) with usual care plus education on cognitive and everyday function with a follow-up assessment 6 months after the formal cessation of aerobic exercise training. Primary outcomes assessed were general cognitive function (Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale–Cognitive subscale [ADAS-Cog]), executive functions (Executive Interview [EXIT-25]), and activities of daily living (Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study–Activities of Daily Living [ADCS-ADL]). Results: Seventy adults randomized to aerobic exercise training or usual care were included in intention-to-treat analyses (mean age 74 years, 51% female, n = 35 per group). At the end of the intervention, the aerobic exercise training group had significantly improved ADAS-Cog performance compared with the usual care plus education group (−1.71 point difference, 95% confidence interval [CI] −3.15 to −0.26, p = 0.02); however, this difference was not significant at the 6-month follow-up (−0.63 point difference, 95% CI −2.34 to 1.07, p = 0.46). There were no significant between-group differences at intervention completion and at the 6-month follow-up in EXIT-25 or ADCS-ADL performance. Examination of secondary measures showed between-group differences at intervention completion favoring the AT group in 6-minute walk distance (30.35 meter difference, 95% CI 5.82 to 54.86, p = 0.02) and in diastolic blood pressure (−6.89 mm Hg difference, 95% CI −12.52 to −1.26, p = 0.02). Conclusions: This study provides preliminary evidence for the efficacy of 6 months of thrice-weekly progressive aerobic training in community-dwelling adults with mild SIVCI, relative to usual care plus education. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01027858. Classification of evidence: This study provides Class II evidence that for adults with mild SIVCI, an aerobic exercise program for 6 months results in a small, significant improvement in ADAS-Cog performance.