Ideological lens matters: Credibility heuristics, pre-existing attitudes, and reactions to messages on ideological websites. (March 2017)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ault, Michael K.; Ness, Alisha M.; Taylor, William D.; Johnson, Genevieve; Connelly, Shane; Jensen, Matthew L.; Dunbar, Norah E.
• Is Part Of: Computers in human behavior. Volume 68(2017)
• Page Start: 315
• Page End: 325
• Publication Date: 2017-03
• Subjects: Internet -- Websites -- Credibility -- Persuasion -- Ideology; Interactive computer systems -- Periodicals; Man-machine systems -- Periodicals; 004.019
• DOI: 10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.053
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0747-5632

Abstract

Abstract: The Internet has become the primary location for ideological groups to recruit members, manage their public image, and organize a diverse membership. To accomplish their goals, these organizations strive to appear credible to target audiences. Metzger, Flanagin, and Medders' (2010) theory of online credibility assessment explains that Internet users rely on peripheral cues to determine whether website information is credible or not. We conducted two studies to test this theory in an online ideological environment. In addition, we investigated how website viewers' pre-existing attitudes regarding the ideological topic affects how they perceive the messages presented on these websites. Results of this research found that this theory partially extends to ideological settings. However, participants did not attribute credibility to ideological topics on a uniform basis. Participants' pre-existing attitudes regarding the topic and the position advocated for by the website sponsor played a critical role in what type of credibility cues were most salient. Highlights: Metzger's theory of online credibility partially applies in ideological settings. Pre-existing attitudes on the topic affects how participants perceive messages. Participants did not attribute credibility to ideological topics on a uniform basis.