A cadaver study comparing three fibreoptic‐assisted techniques for converting a supraglottic airway to a cuffed tracheal tube2. (11th November 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Olesnicky, B. L.; Rehak, A.; Bestic, W. B.; Brock, J. T.; Watterson, L.
• Is Part Of: Anaesthesia. Volume 72:Number 2(2017:Feb.)
• Page Start: 223
• Page End: 229
• Publication Date: 2016-11-11
• Subjects: difficult airway algorithm -- failed Intubation: treatment -- LMA: intubation guide; Anesthesia -- Periodicals; 617.96
• DOI: 10.1111/anae.13733
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0003-2409

Abstract

Summary: After rescuing an airway with a supraglottic airway device, a method to convert it to a cuffed tracheal tube is often needed. The best method to do this has never been directly studied. We compared three techniques for conversion of a standard LMA ® Unique airway to a cuffed endotracheal tube using a fibrescope. The primary endpoint was time to intubation, with secondary endpoints of success rate, perceived difficulty and preferred technique. We also investigated the relationship between level of training and prior training and experience with the techniques on the primary outcome. The mean (95% CI) time to intubation using a direct tracheal tube technique of 37 (31–42) s was significantly shorter than either the Aintree intubation catheter technique at 70 (60–80) s, or a guidewire technique at 126 (110–141) s (p < 0.001). Most (13/24) participants rated the tracheal tube as their preferred technique, while 11/24 preferred the Aintree technique. In terms of perceived difficulty, 23/24, 21/24 and 9/24 participants rated the tracheal tube technique, Aintree technique and guidewire technique, respectively, as either very easy or easy. There was no relationship between prior training, prior experience or level of training on time to completion of any of the techniques. We conclude the tracheal tube and Aintree techniques both provide a rapid and easy method for conversion of a supraglottic airway device to a cuffed tracheal tube. The guidewire technique cannot be recommended.