A paired comparison analysis of third-party rater thyroidectomy scar preference. Issue 1 (5th December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rajakumar, C; Doyle, P C; Brandt, M G; Moore, C C; Nichols, A; Franklin, J H; Yoo, J; Fung, K
• Is Part Of: Journal of laryngology & otology. Volume 131:Issue 1(2017)
• Page Start: 13
• Page End: 18
• Publication Date: 2016-12-05
• Subjects: Thyroidectomy, -- Thyroid Gland, -- Cicatrix, -- Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures, -- Otolaryngology, -- Endocrine Surgical Procedures, -- Aesthetics; Otolaryngology -- Periodicals; 617.51
• DOI: 10.1017/S002221511600952X
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-2151

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: To determine the length and position of a thyroidectomy scar that is cosmetically most appealing to naïve raters. Methods: Images of thyroidectomy scars were reproduced on male and female necks using digital imaging software. Surgical variables studied were scar position and length. Fifteen raters were presented with 56 scar pairings and asked to identify which was preferred cosmetically. Twenty duplicate pairings were included to assess rater reliability. Analysis of variance was used to determine preference. Results: Raters preferred low, short scars, followed by high, short scars, with long scars in either position being less desirable ( p < 0.05). Twelve of 15 raters had acceptable intra-rater and inter-rater reliability. Conclusion: Naïve raters preferred low, short scars over the alternatives. High, short scars were the next most favourably rated. If other factors influencing incision choice are considered equal, surgeons should consider these preferences in scar position and length when planning their thyroidectomy approach.