Assessment of infarct‐specific cardiac motion dysfunction using modeling and multimodal magnetic resonance merging. Issue 2 (15th July 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Leong, Chen Onn; Liew, Yih Miin; Bilgen, Mehmet; Abdul Aziz, Yang Faridah; Chee, Kok Han; Chiam, Yin Kia; Lim, Einly
• Is Part Of: Journal of magnetic resonance imaging. Volume 45:Issue 2(2017)
• Page Start: 525
• Page End: 534
• Publication Date: 2016-07-15
• Subjects: tagged MRI -- late gadolinium enhancement -- LV motion analysis -- cardiac modeling -- myocardial infarction; Magnetic resonance imaging -- Periodicals; 616
• DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25390
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1053-1807

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: To propose a cardiac motion tracking model that evaluates wall motion abnormality in postmyocardial infarction patients. Correlation between the motion parameter of the model and left ventricle (LV) function was also determined. Materials and Methods: Twelve male patients with post‐ST elevation myocardial infarction (post‐STEMI) and 10 healthy controls of the same gender were recruited to undergo cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) using a 1.5T scanner. Using an infarct‐specific LV division approach, the late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) MRI images were used to divide the LV on the tagged MRI images into infarct, adjacent, and remote sectors. Motion tracking was performed using the infarct‐specific two‐parameter empirical deformable model (TPEDM). The match quality was defined as the position error computed using root‐mean‐square (RMS) distance between the estimated and expert‐verified tag intersections. The position errors were compared with the ones from our previously published fixed‐sector TPEDM. Cine MRI images were used to calculate regional ejection fraction (REF). Correlation between the end‐systolic contraction parameter ( α ES ) with REF was determined. Results: The position errors in the proposed model were significantly lower than the fixed‐sector model ( P < 0.01). The median position errors were 0.82 mm versus 1.23 mm. The α ES correlates significantly with REF ( r = 0.91, P < 0.01). Conclusion: The infarct‐specific TPEDM combines the morphological and functional information from LGE and tagged MRI images. It was shown to outperform the fixed‐sector model in assessing regional LV dysfunction. The significant correlation between α ES and REF added prognostic value because it indicated an impairment of cardiac function with the increase of infarct transmurality. Level of Evidence: 3 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;45:525–534.