Fluvial carbon export from a lowland Amazonian rainforest in relation to atmospheric fluxes. Issue 12 (14th December 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vihermaa, Leena E.; Waldron, Susan; Domingues, Tomas; Grace, John; Cosio, Eric G.; Limonchi, Fabian; Hopkinson, Chris; da Rocha, Humberto Ribeiro; Gloor, Emanuel
• Is Part Of: Journal of geophysical research. Volume 121:Issue 12(2016:Dec.)
• Page Start: 3001
• Page End: 3018
• Publication Date: 2016-12-14
• Subjects: eddy covariance -- CO2 efflux -- DIC -- DOC -- POC -- fluvial C export; Geobiology -- Periodicals; Biogeochemistry -- Periodicals; Biotic communities -- Periodicals; Geophysics -- Periodicals; 577.14
• DOI: 10.1002/2016JG003464
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2169-8953

Abstract

Abstract: We constructed a whole carbon budget for a catchment in the Western Amazon Basin, combining drainage water analyses with eddy covariance (EC) measured terrestrial CO2 fluxes. As fluvial C export can represent permanent C export it must be included in assessments of whole site C balance, but it is rarely done. The footprint area of the flux tower is drained by two small streams (~5–7 km 2 ) from which we measured the dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC), dissolved organic carbon (DOC), particulate organic carbon (POC) export, and CO2 efflux. The EC measurements showed the site C balance to be +0.7 ± 9.7 Mg C ha −1 yr −1 (a source to the atmosphere) and fluvial export was 0.3 ± 0.04 Mg C ha −1 yr −1 . Of the total fluvial loss 34% was DIC, 37% DOC, and 29% POC. The wet season was most important for fluvial C export. There was a large uncertainty associated with the EC results and with previous biomass plot studies (−0.5 ± 4.1 Mg C ha −1 yr −1 ); hence, it cannot be concluded with certainty whether the site is C sink or source. The fluvial export corresponds to only 3–7% of the uncertainty related to the site C balance; thus, other factors need to be considered to reduce the uncertainty and refine the estimated C balance. However, stream C export is significant, especially for almost neutral sites where fluvial loss may determine the direction of the site C balance. The fate of C downstream then dictates the overall climate impact of fluvial export. Key Points: Forest‐to‐atmosphere flux indicated a small C source, 0.7 Mg C ha −1 yr −1 Forest‐to‐river and water‐to‐atmosphere fluxes were 0.3 and 0.09‐0.14 Mg C ha −1 yr −1, respectively Fluvial C loss was highest during wet season, especially in the case of DOC