Rewriting recursive aggregates in answer set programming: back to monotonicity. Issue 4 (3rd September 2015)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: ALVIANO, MARIO; FABER, WOLFGANG; GEBSER, MARTIN
• Editors: Eiter, Thomas; Toni, Francesca
• Is Part Of: Theory and practice of logic programming. Volume 15:Issue 4/5(2015)
• Page Start: 559
• Page End: 573
• Publication Date: 2015-09-03
• Subjects: answer set programming, -- polynomial, -- faithful, -- and modular translation, -- aggregation functions; Logic programming -- Periodicals; Artificial intelligence -- Computer programs -- Periodicals; Constraint programming (Computer science) -- Periodicals; 005.115
• DOI: 10.1017/S1471068415000228
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1471-0684

Abstract

Abstract: Aggregation functions are widely used in answer set programming for representing and reasoning on knowledge involving sets of objects collectively. Current implementations simplify the structure of programs in order to optimize the overall performance. In particular, aggregates are rewritten into simpler forms known as monotone aggregates. Since the evaluation of normal programs with monotone aggregates is in general on a lower complexity level than the evaluation of normal programs with arbitrary aggregates, any faithful translation function must introduce disjunction in rule heads in some cases. However, no function of this kind is known. The paper closes this gap by introducing a polynomial, faithful, and modular translation for rewriting common aggregation functions into the simpler form accepted by current solvers. A prototype system allows for experimenting with arbitrary recursive aggregates, which are also supported in the recent version 4.5 of the groundergringo, using the methods presented in this paper.