Value of E-PASS models for predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma. Issue 3 (March 2016)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Value of E-PASS models for predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma. Issue 3 (March 2016)
- Main Title:
- Value of E-PASS models for predicting postoperative morbidity and mortality in resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma
- Authors:
- Haga, Yoshio
Miyamoto, Atsushi
Wada, Yasuo
Takami, Yuko
Takeuchi, Hitoshi - Abstract:
- Abstract: Background: It has previously been reported that a general risk model, Estimation of Physiologic Ability and Surgical Stress (E-PASS), and its modified version, mE-PASS, had a high predictive power for postoperative mortality and morbidity in a variety of gastrointestinal surgeries. This study evaluated their utilities in proximal biliary carcinoma resection. Methods: E-PASS variables were collected in patients undergoing resection of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma and gallbladder carcinoma in Japanese referral hospitals. Results: Analysis of 125 patients with gallbladder cancer and 97 patients with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma ( n = 222). Fifty-six patients (25%) underwent liver resection with either hemihepatectomy or extended hemihepatectomy. The E-PASS models showed a high discrimination power to predict in-hospital mortality; areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (95% confidence intervals) were 0.85 (0.76–0.94) for E-PASS and 0.82 (0.73–0.91) for mE-PASS. The predicted mortality rates correlated with the severity of postoperative complications (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient: ρ = 0.51, P < 0.001 for E-PASS; ρ = 0.47, P < 0.001 for mE-PASS). Conclusions: The E-PASS models examined herein may accurately predict postoperative morbidity and mortality in proximal biliary carcinoma resection. These models will be useful for surgical decision-making, informed consent, and risk adjustments in surgical audits.
- Is Part Of:
- HPB. Volume 18:Issue 3(2016)
- Journal:
- HPB
- Issue:
- Volume 18:Issue 3(2016)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 18, Issue 3 (2016)
- Year:
- 2016
- Volume:
- 18
- Issue:
- 3
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2016-0018-0003-0000
- Page Start:
- 271
- Page End:
- 278
- Publication Date:
- 2016-03
- Subjects:
- Liver -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Biliary tract -- Diseases -- Periodicals
Pancreas -- Diseases -- Periodicals
616.362005 - Journal URLs:
- https://www.journals.elsevier.com/hpb/ ↗
http://www.hpbonline.org/current ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1111/(ISSN)1477-2574 ↗
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/ ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.hpb.2015.09.001 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 1365-182X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4335.262340
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 1710.xml