The performance of resistance, inductance, and capacitance handheld meters for determining moisture content of low-carbon fuels. (15th January 2017)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- The performance of resistance, inductance, and capacitance handheld meters for determining moisture content of low-carbon fuels. (15th January 2017)
- Main Title:
- The performance of resistance, inductance, and capacitance handheld meters for determining moisture content of low-carbon fuels
- Authors:
- Davis, J.
Matovic, D.
Pollard, A. - Abstract:
- Highlights: The performance of 9 handheld moisture meters on 7 low-carbon fuels was determined. The moisture content was increased by 5% intervals from a range of 0–60% (wet-basis). Performance varied by each meter, irrespective of the measurement technology. Performance improved if the sample was similar to the meters intended sample material. Abstract: The moisture content (MC) of a fuel is generally determined through gravimetric analysis where a sample is dehydrated in an oven over a period of approximately 24 h; the MC is then calculated by dividing the difference between the initial and final mass, by the initial mass. Handheld moisture meters offer the benefit of near-instantaneous measurements and should provide accurate and dependable results. The performance of nine moisture meters applied to seven low-carbon fuels (LCFs) was determined. The nine meters employed three measurement technologies: electrical conductance/resistance, electrical capacitance and electromagnetic inductance. The seven LCF samples considered were: shredded switchgrass, two batches of shredded wood, two batches of ragger tails and two batches of sanitary products. A moisture meter applicable for LCF should have a clear relationship between the actual MC and the measured MC, low variability, and be accurate within an absolute difference of 2%. Results indicated that none of the meters were suitable for use on LCF in general. It was not possible to identify a specific measurement technology thatHighlights: The performance of 9 handheld moisture meters on 7 low-carbon fuels was determined. The moisture content was increased by 5% intervals from a range of 0–60% (wet-basis). Performance varied by each meter, irrespective of the measurement technology. Performance improved if the sample was similar to the meters intended sample material. Abstract: The moisture content (MC) of a fuel is generally determined through gravimetric analysis where a sample is dehydrated in an oven over a period of approximately 24 h; the MC is then calculated by dividing the difference between the initial and final mass, by the initial mass. Handheld moisture meters offer the benefit of near-instantaneous measurements and should provide accurate and dependable results. The performance of nine moisture meters applied to seven low-carbon fuels (LCFs) was determined. The nine meters employed three measurement technologies: electrical conductance/resistance, electrical capacitance and electromagnetic inductance. The seven LCF samples considered were: shredded switchgrass, two batches of shredded wood, two batches of ragger tails and two batches of sanitary products. A moisture meter applicable for LCF should have a clear relationship between the actual MC and the measured MC, low variability, and be accurate within an absolute difference of 2%. Results indicated that none of the meters were suitable for use on LCF in general. It was not possible to identify a specific measurement technology that performed better for a certain LCF type from the results. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Fuel. Volume 188(2017)
- Journal:
- Fuel
- Issue:
- Volume 188(2017)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 188, Issue 2017 (2017)
- Year:
- 2017
- Volume:
- 188
- Issue:
- 2017
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2017-0188-2017-0000
- Page Start:
- 254
- Page End:
- 266
- Publication Date:
- 2017-01-15
- Subjects:
- Moisture -- Low-carbon fuel -- Alternative fuel -- Moisture meter -- Accuracy -- Variability
Fuel -- Periodicals
Coal -- Periodicals
Coal
Fuel
Periodicals
662.6 - Journal URLs:
- http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/journal/latest/00162361 ↗
http://www.elsevier.com/journals ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1016/j.fuel.2016.10.024 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0016-2361
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 4048.000000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library HMNTS - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 1301.xml